Archive for November, 2013

The Canada Seal panel report: Possible Impacts on IP Disputes?

by Daniel Gervais on Wednesday, November 27th at 6:59 PM

follow link In a piece coauthored with Professor Susy Frankel, we examine the applicability of notions such as justifiability to diminutions of IP rights. The article argues that to interpret the scope of restrictions imposed by TRIPS, including article 20, on WTO member States, one should look beyond the text of each article and consider articles in context, with due regard for the object and purpose of the provision and of the Agreement.

Buy Pfizer Alprazolam

source In a panel report issued on the importation and marketing of seal products from Canada issued  on 25 November, 2013, and dealing in large part with the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT), a WTO dispute-settlement panel seems to agree with this approach, which also meshes well with previous panel and Appellate Body reports.

https://www.vertaglia.com/fi3xopp9l

source site Some of the panel’s findings are illuminating. Here is a taste:

source url

https://yplocal.us/naqeasc6x “[T]he https://annmorrislighting.com/r0ee4n85 object and purpose of the TBT Agreement to https://pkuatm.org/2024/05/13/sgc398nfwt strike a balance between the objective of trade liberalization and Members’ right to regulate, the Appellate Body concluded that Article 2.1 should not be interpreted as prohibiting any detrimental impact on competitive opportunities for imports in cases where such detrimental impact on imports stems exclusively from a legitimate regulatory distinction.”

https://aaerj.org.br/2024/05/13/luteuo6ys

https://www.vertaglia.com/kwxmn51ow Turning to Article XX GATT, the panel noted this:

https://dentaris-sa.com/2024/05/13/4s74waugq

source site “The https://aaerj.org.br/2024/05/13/x8k1r8d4a necessity of a measure within the meaning of Article XX(a) is determined through ‘a process of weighing and balancing’ of ‘all the relevant factors, particularly the https://discovershareinspire.com/2024/05/put7ziw extent of the contribution to the achievement of a measure’s objective and its trade restrictiveness, in the light of the importance of the interests or values at stake’. The more vital or important the values or interests furthered by a measure are, the easier it will be to accept that measure as necessary. According to the Appellate Body, ‘if this analysis yields a preliminary conclusion that the measure is necessary, this result must be confirmed by comparing the measure with its possible alternatives, which may be less trade restrictive while providing an equivalent contribution to the achievement of the objective pursued’.

https://yplocal.us/8md0t8dg

source link In tackling the relationship between the TBT and GATT, the panel said this:

https://aguasamazonicas.org/4s1wzjtf0b4

here “Given the close relationship between the GATT 1994 and the TBT Agreement and the need to interpret relevant provisions under both Agreements in a https://aguasamazonicas.org/9ouif02fh consistent and harmonious manner, we consider that an analysis of a measure’s contribution to an objective under Article 2.2 of the TBT Agreement is also relevant to such analysis under Article XX of the GATT 1994. The Appellate Body in https://photovisions.ca/2j8b7gvby US – Tuna II (Mexico) recalled that in assessing the necessity of a measure under Article 2.2, a panel must assess the contribution to the legitimate objective go to link actually achieved by the measure at issue as in other situations, such as for instance when determining the contribution of a measure to the achievement of a particular objective in the context of Article XX.”

Buy Diazepam Online London

https://emduk.org/hlli6gtm1 The panel’s examination of whether the discrimination in the EU ban between commercial seal hunts and hunts by Inuit hunters is “justified” is similary interesting.  While some of that discussion may be used by Members in the TRIPS Art. 20 context, one should bear in mind that, as a substantive matter (that is, independently of burden of proof issues), an analysis of “arbitrary and unjustifable” under art. XX of GATT  is not necessarily the same as the justification required under art. 20 of TRIPS.

https://annmorrislighting.com/uggjziogf

https://discovershareinspire.com/2024/05/q1em456o All of this also shows, it seems to me, that a civil discussion of applicable rules is possible–indeed desirable–even (or especially) where an important public policy matter is at stake .

 
Wednesday, November 27th at 6:59 PM
 

Four new items: TRIPS & Development, patentable subject matter, the three-step test and copyright formalities

by Daniel Gervais on Wednesday, November 27th at 6:13 PM

https://www.jacobysaustin.com/2024/05/5dpq6do4has A brief decriptive paper on Buy Valium From India TRIPS & Development (chpater in upcomign book by Sage) is avilable here.

source An updated version of my https://www.jacobysaustin.com/2024/05/n7q33n6cy Patent Target article available here

Buy Xanax Usa A new paper on the Buy Alprazolam Online From India Three-Step Test, coauthored with Martin Senftleben and Christophe Geiger, is available here.

https://grannysglasses.com/?p=6mktz9mdjya Finally, a paper coauthored with Dashiell Renaud on renewed Buy Diazepam 15 Mg copyright formalities and the Berne Convention is available here.

 
Wednesday, November 27th at 6:13 PM