Articles

Below are some articles that might interest you. If you would like to suggest an article for this page, please email us.

• Commission on Intellectual Property Rights, source Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy, Report of the Commission on Intellectual Property Rights, London, September 2002. (2002)
• IP Asia, source site Survey of Asian Trademark Law and the TRIPs Agreement, https://thefooduntold.com/food-science/dsnfjrmcfb IP Asia, April 27, 1994, 2. (1994)
• United States Trade Representative, https://gsaudemarketing.com.br/x5b9mqgg68 TRIPS Portions from the Memorandum for the United States Trade Representative, Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Journal 265 (1995)
• Frederick M. Abbott, Tramadol Uk Order The WTO TRIPS Agreement and Global Economic Development, 72 Chicago-Kent Law Review 385 (1996)
• Frederick M. Abbott, https://www.pathwaysmagazineonline.com/q82gwnf7 Protecting First World Assets in the Third World: Intellectual Property Negotiations in the GATT Multilateral Framework, 22 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 689 (1989)
• R. Acharya, https://www.insearchofsukoon.com/xbepsil Patenting of Biotechnology, GATT and the Erosion of the World’s Biodiversity, Journal of World Trade 82 (1991)
• Martin J. Adelman, go to site Prospects and Limits of the Patent Provision in the TRIPS Agreement: The Case of India, 29 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 507. (1996)
• Sudhir D. Ahuja, Tramadol Ordering GATT and TRIPS- The Impact on the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry, 65 Patent World 28 (1994)
• American Society of International Law, https://living4youboutique.com/ww76djm23d1 Biotechnology, Human Rights, And Intellectual Property, 96 American Society of International Law Proceedings 114 (2002)
• K. Aoki, https://www.inaxorio.com/cxv4peeb5t Neocolonialism, Anticommons Property, and Biopiracy in the (Not-So-Brave) New World Order of International Intellectual Property Protection, 6 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 11 (1998)
• Robert S.W. Barry, https://autismwish.org/iuflczt9 The Effect of GATT and TRIPS on U.K. Patent Law, 81 Patent World 13 (1996)
• Ludwig Bauemer, go here Protection of Geographical Indications under WIPO Treaties and Questions Concerning the Relationship Between Those Treaties and the TRIPS Agreement, From the Symposium on the International Protection of Geographical Indications in the Worldwide Context, 1997. Geneva, WIPO, 1999. (1999)
• Robert P. Benko, https://geneticsandfertility.com/li5tfnbs23w Intellectual Property Rights and the Uruguay Round, World Economy 217 (1988)
• Erwin F. Berrier Jr, https://www.techonicsltd.com/uncategorized/fq8c0uho5 Global Patent Costs Must Be Reduced, 36 I.D.E.A. 473. (1996)
• C.J. Bilzi, https://bxscco.com/yijwci94w02 Towards an Intellectual Property Agreement in the GATT: View from the Private Sector, Ga. J. Int’l & Comp. L., 19, p. 307-312. (1989)
• Michael Blakeney, https://etbscreenwriting.com/3xuwspb3q Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers, 24 E.I.P.R. 9. (2002)
• Michael Blakeney, https://living4youboutique.com/woq0w15m0k The Protection of Traditional Knowledge Under Intellectual Property Law, 22 E.I.P.R 251. (2000)
• Michael Blakeney, Tramadol Order Online Overnight The Impact of the TRIPs Agreement in the Asia Pacific Region, 10 E.I.P.R. 544. (1996)
• Michael Blakeney, Ordering Tramadol Overnight Well-Known Marks, E.I.P.R. 481. (1994)
• Gaelle Bontinck, https://brako.com/en/itoq4l3l The TRIPs Agreement and The ECJ: A New Dawn? Some Comments About Joined Cases C-300/98 and C-392/98, Parfums Dior and Assco Gerüste, Jean Monnet Papers (2001)
• A.J. Bradley, https://gsaudemarketing.com.br/31ptru7p Intellectual Property Rights, Investment and Trade in the Uruguay Round, 1 Stanford Journal of International Law 64. (1987)
• David J. Brennan, https://ict-pulse.com/2024/07/flduxiknd The Three-Step Frenzy--Why the TRIPS Panel Decision Might Be Considered Per Incuriam, Intellectual Property Quarterly 212. (2002)
• Michael F. Brown, Lowest Priced Tramadol Online Can Culture Be Copyrighted?, 39 Current Anthropology 193 (1998)
• Alison Butler, Tramadol Online Fast Delivery The Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights: What Is at Stake?, Journal of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Nov-Dec. 34. (1990)
• Sandrine Cahn, https://www.insearchofsukoon.com/4tkjsth8f The Cultural Exception: Does it Exist in GATT and GATS Framework? How Does It Affect or Is IT Affected by The Agreement on TRIPS?, 15 Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal 281. (1997)
• Marney L. Cheek, https://bxscco.com/6qfbpfv98o1 The Limits of Informal Regulatory Cooperation in International Affairs: A Review of Global Intellectual Property Regime, 333 George Washington International Law Review 277. (2001)
• Xiao Yi Chen, https://thefooduntold.com/food-science/3ff1hx5zip A Proposal for the International Convention for Protection Against Unfair Competition, 8 E.I.P.R. 450. (1996)
• Zheng Chengsi, https://geneticsandfertility.com/yhsvfq92 Looking Into the Revision of the Trademark and Copyright Laws From the Perspective of China, 24 E.I.P.R 313. (2002)
• Shlomo Cohen, https://www.inaxorio.com/zai437j1u04 GATT TRIPS and Character Merchandising, 58 Trademark World 23 (1993)
• Shlomo Cohen, Tramadol Purchase Online Uk GATT: A TRIPS in the Right Direction, 73 Trademark World 32. (1994/1995)
• Wesley Cohen, https://www.pathwaysmagazineonline.com/43lhmarvmf Appropriability Conditions and Why Firms Patent and Why They Do Not in the American Manufacturing Sector, NBER Working Paper No. 7552 (2000)
• Ned L. Conley, Order Tramadol Online Usa First-to-lnvent: A Superior System for the United States, 22 St. Mary’s L.J. 779, 799-781. (1991)
• Albrecht Conrad, Buy Ultram Tramadol Online The Protection of Geographical Indications in the TRIPS Agreements, 86 The Trademark Reporter 11 (1996)
• Rosemary J. Coombe, Tramadol 180 Tabs Online Intellectual Property, Human Rights & Sovereignty: New Dilemmas in International Law Posed by the Recognition of Indigenous Knowledge and the Conversation of Biodiversity, 6 Ind. J. Global Stud. 59, 83. (1998)
• Carlos M. Correa, go here Intellectual Property in the Field of Integrated Circuits: Implications for Developing Countries, 2 World Competition 83. (1990)
• Carlos M. Correa, https://splendormedicinaregenerativa.com/f00li0jw90 The Pharmaceutical Industry and Biotechnology. Opportunities and Constraints for Developing Countries, 2 World Competition 56 (1991)
• Thomas Cottier, https://ict-pulse.com/2024/07/7hhv6f8lyaq The Prospects for Intellectual Property in GATT, Common Law Market Review (28): 383-414. (1991)
• R.S. Crespi, https://etbscreenwriting.com/rnpibj3a9 Patents and Plant Variety Rights: Is There an Interface Problem?, 2 I.I.C. 168. (1992)
• Peter R. Crockford, go GATT and Minimum Standards for Intellectual Property Rights, Paper presented at the 23rd IBA Biennial Conference, New York, September 19-23, 1990 (1990)
• Daniel J. Gervais, go here The TRIPS Agreement: Interpretation and Implementation, 21 E.I.P.R. 156. (1999)
• M.L. Darmschroder, Cheapest Place To Order Tramadol Online Intellectual Property Rights and the GATT: United States Goals in the Uruguay Round, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 371. (1988)
• R.R. Deveza, go here A Grandfather Clause, Due Process and the GATT: Whatever Happened to the Grandfather Clause of the Process Patent Act of 1988, 1 Rutgers Computer and Technology Law Journal 67 (1992)
• Rajan Dhanjee, https://living4youboutique.com/1kj5fj1fyc Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS): Objectives, Approaches and Basic Principles of the GATT and of Intellectual Property Conventions, Journal of World Trade, Vol. 24, No. 5. (1990)
• B. Dhar, get link Draft on TRIPS. Complete Denial of Developing Countries, 6 Economic and Political Weekly 276. (1992)
• Graeme B. Dinwoodie, https://gsaudemarketing.com.br/yqza4al9doe Integration of International and Domestic Intellectual Property Lawmaking, 23 Columbia-VLA Journal of Law and the Arts 307 (2000)
• David Djaic, https://thefooduntold.com/food-science/uy796zd6 Why does the Enforcement of Indonesia’s Intellectual Property Laws Continue to be a Problem?, 22 E.I.P.R. 454. (2000)
• Teruo Doi, Tramadol Online Nc Japan Legislation: TRIPS Agreement, E.I.P.R. D--42. (1995)
• Teruo Doi, The TRIPS Agreement and the Copyright Law of Japan: A Comparative Analysis, Journal of the Japanese Group of AIPPI 3 (1996)
• Graham Dutfield, TRIPS-Related Aspects Of Traditional Knowledge, 33 Case W. Res. J. Int’l L. 233. (2001)
• Frank Emmert, Intellectual Property in the Uruguay Round-Negotiating strategies of the Western Industrialized Countries, Michigan Journal of International Law Vol. 11, No. 4. (1990)
• Christine Haight Farely, Conflicts Between U.S. Law and International Treaties Concerning Geographical Indications, 22 Whittier Law Review 73. (2000)
• Thomas J. Field Jr, Pharmaceuticals and Intellectual Property: Meeting Needs Throughout the World, 31 I.D.E.A. 3. (1991)
• Mihály Fiscor, How much of what? The ‘Three-Step Test’ and Its Application in Two Recent WTO Dispute Settlement Cases, 192 RIDA 111. (2002)
• Brian F. Fitzgerald, Software as Discourse? The Challenge For Information Law, 22 E.I.P.R. 47. (2002)
• Sara M. Ford, Compulsory Licensing Provisions Under the TRIPS Agreement; Balancing Pills and Patents, American University International Law Review, 15, 941-974. (2000)
• P. Gakuna, Intellectual Property: Perspective of the Developing World, 2 Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 362 (1989)
• Ruth L. Gana (Okediji), Prospects for Developing Countries under the TRIPS Agreement, 29 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 735. (1996)
• Paul Edward Geller, From Patchwork to Network: Strategies for International Intellectual Property in Flux, 31 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 553. (1998)
• Paul Edward Geller, International Intellectual Property, Conflicts of Laws and Internet Remedies, 22 E.I.P.R. 125. (2000)
• Paul Edward Geller, Can the GATT Incorporate Berne Whole?, 4 BNAs World Intellectual Property Report 193. (1990)
• Peter M. Gerhart, Why Lawmaking for Global Intellectual Property is Unbalanced, 22 E.I.P.R. 309. (2000)
• Daniel J. Gervais, Traditional Knowledge & Intellectual Property: A Trips-Compatible Approach, Mich. St. L. Rev. 137-166. (2005)
• Daniel J. Gervais, Towards A New Core International Copyright Norm: The Reverse Three-Step Test, 9 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 1-37. (2005)
• Daniel J. Gervais, The Compatibility of the "Skill and Labour" Originality Standard with the Berne Convention and the TRIPs Agreement, 26:2 Eur. Int. Prop. Rev. 75-80. (2004)
• Daniel J. Gervais, Spiritual But Not Intellectual? The Protection of Sacred, 11 Cardozo J. of Int. (2003)
• Daniel J. Gervais, TRIPS, Doha & Traditional Knowledge, 6J. of World Int. Prop. 403-419. (2003)
• Daniel J. Gervais, "Feist Goes Global”: A Comparative Analysis of the Notion of Originality in Copyright Law, 49 Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA 949. (2002)
• Daniel J. Gervais, The Internationalization of Intellectual Property: New Challenges from the Very Old and the Very New, 12 Fordham Intellectual Property Media & Entertainment Law Journal 929 (2002)
• Daniel J. Gervais, Les negociations TRIPS et l’Uruguay Round: le point a dix semaines de Bruxelles, 5 C.J.F.E. 1205. (1990)
• M. Geuze, Protection of Geographical Indications Under the TRIPS Agreement and Related Work of the World Trade Organization, From Symposium on the International Protection of Geographical Indications in the WorldWide Context, 1997. Geneva, WIPO. (1999)
• Florent Gevers, Topical Issues in the Protection of Geographical Indications, WIPO Symposium on the International Protection of Geographical Indications, 1997. Geneva: WIPO, at p. 156. (1999)
• Florent Gevers, Geographical Names and Signs Used as Trade Marks, 8 E.I.P.R. 285. (1990)
• Jane C. Ginsburg, Supranational Copyright Law? The WTO Panel Decision and the “Three-Step Test” For Copyright Exceptions, 187 RIDA 3. (2002)
• Henry M. Gladney, Digital Intellectual Property: Controversial and International Aspects, 24 Columbia-VLA Journal of Law and the Arts 47. (2000)
• J. Govaere, Copyright Protection of Computer Software, 8 E.I.P.R. 454. (1996)
• R.M. Gunewardene, GATT and the Developing World: Is a New Principle of Trade Liberalisation Needed?, 1 Maryland Journal of International Law and Trade 48. (1991)
• Robert J. Gutowski, The Marriage of Intellectual Property and International Trade in the TRIPS Agreement: Strange Bedfellows or a match made in Heaven, 47 Buffalo Law Review 713. (1999)
• Marci A. Hamilton, The TRIPS Agreement: Imperialistic, Outdated, and Overprotective, 29 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 613. (1996)
• Henning Harte-Bavendamm, Geographical Indications and Trademarks: Harmony or Conflict?, WIPO: Symposium on the International Protection of Geographical Indications, 1999. Geneva: WIPO, 2000. (2000)
• David Hartridge, Intellectual Property Rights: The Issues in GATT, 22 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 897. (1989)
• Paul J. Heald, Trademarks and Geographical Indications: Exploring the Contours of the TRIPS Agreement, 29 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 635 (1996)
• Christopher Heath, All Her Troubles Seemed So Far Away: EU v Japan Before the WTO, 18(12) E.I.P.R. 677-680 (1996)
• T. Heide, The Berne Three-Step Test and The Proposed Copyright Directive, 21 E.I.P.R. 105-109 (1999)
• Laurence R. Helfer, World Music on a U.S. Stage: A Berne/TRIPS and Economic Analysis of the Fairness in Music Licensing Act, 80 Boston University Law Review 93 (2000)
• Laurence R. Helfer, Adjudicating Copyright Claims under the TRIPS Agreement: A Case for a European Human Right Analogy, 39 Harvard International Law Journal 357 (1998)
• Sarah E. Henry, The First International Challenge to U.S. Copyright Law: What Does the WTO Analysis of 17 U.S.C. §110(5) Means to the Future of International Harmonization of Copyright Laws Under the TRIPS Agreement?, Penn State International Law Review 301. (2001)
• International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association, GATT TRIPS and the Pharmaceutical Industry: A Review, 53 Patent World 29 (1995)
• Jeffrey Waincymer, Transparency Of Dispute Settlement Within The World Trade Organization, 24 Melbourne University Law Review 797. (2000)
• Philippe Cullet, Patents and Medicines: The Relationship between TRIPS and the Human Right to Health, 79 International Affairs 139-160 (2003)
• Shayana Kadidal, Plants, Poverty, and Pharmaceutical Patents, Yale Law Journal 103 (177): 223-58. (1993)
• Michel M. Kostecki, Sharing Intellectual Property Between the Rich and the Poor, E.I.P.R. 272. (1991)
• Muria Kruger, Harmonizing TRIPS and the CBD: A Proposal from India, 10 Minnesota Journal of Global Trade 169. (2001)
• Hans Peter Kunz-Hallstein, The United States Proposal for a GATT Agreement on Intellectual Property and the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, 22 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 266. (1989)
• Annette Kur, The Right to Use One’s Own Trade Mark: A Self-evident Issue or a New Concept in German, European, and International Trade Mark Law?, 4 E.I.P.R. 198. (1996)
• Paul Kuruk, Protecting Folklore Under Modern Intellectual Property Regimes: A Reappraisal Of The Tensions Between Individual And Communal Rights In Africa And The United States, 48 American University Law Review 769. (1999)
• Marshall A. Leaffer, Protecting United States Intellectual Property Abroad: Toward New Multilateralism, 76 Iowa Law Review 273. (1991)
• Leigh Ann Linquist, Champagne or Champagne? An Examination of U.S. Failure to Comply with the Geographical Provisions of the TRIPS Agreement, 27 Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 309. (1999)
• Gao Lulin, A Preliminary Analysis of the TRIPS Negotiations of the Uruguay Round of GATT, No.1 China Patents & Trademarks 8. (1993)
• C. Macdonald-Brown, First WTO Decision on Trips: India - Patent Protection for Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Chemical Products, 20 E.I.P.R. 69. (1998)
• Charles Macedo, First-to-File: Is American Adoption of the International Standard in Patent Law Worth the Price?, Columbia Business Law Review 543. (1988)
• I.C. Malloy III, The Caribbean Basin Initiative: A Proposal to Attract Investment and Technological Infusion via Inter-American System of Co-operative Protection for Intellectual Property, The University of Miami Inter-American Review 175. (1991 Fal)
• Gerald D. Jr. Malpass, Life after the GATT TRIPS Agreement—Has the Competitive position of U.S. Inventors Changed?, 19 Houston Journal of International Law 207. (1996)
• E. Mangassarian, Technological Trends and the Changing Face of International Intellectual Property Law, 11 SPG International Legal Perspective 125. (2001)
• Keith E. Maskus, Ensuring Access to Essential Medicines: Some Economic Considerations, 20 Wisconsin International Law Journal, 563. (2002)
• Keith E. Maskus, Intellectual Property Rights And Economic Development, 32 Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 471 (2000)
• Brittany Whobrey, International Patent Law and Public Health: Analyzing TRIPS’ Effect on Access to Pharmaceuticals in Developing Countries, 45 Brandeis Law Journal 623 (2007)
• Kevin W. McCabe, The January 1999 Review of Article 27 of the TRIPS Agreement: Diverging Views of Developed and Developing countries toward Patentability of Biotechnology, 6 Journal of Intellectual Property 41. (1998)
• Vijay Yalamanchili, State of India’s TRIPS-Compliant Patent Regime, 26 Biotechnology Law Report 211 (2007)
• Michelle McGrath, The Patent Provisions in TRIPS: Protecting Reasonable Remuneration for Services Rendered--or the Latest Development in Western Colonialism?, 18 E.I.P.R. 398. (1996)
• Eleanor K. Meltzer, TRIPS and Trademarks, or-GATT Got Your Tongue?, 83 The Trademark Reporter 18 (1993)
• Philip C. Mendes da Costa, Patent Harmonization through GATT: TRIP or trap, 45 Patent World 23. (1992)
• T. Mesevage, The Carrot and the Stick: Protecting U.S. Intellectual Property in Developing Countries, 2 Rutgers Computer and Technology Law Journal 431 (1991)
• Todd R. Miller, Inventions Made in U.S.A.: Foreign "Equality’ under Applicable International Treaties, 5 I.I.C. 587. (1996)
• Anne Moebes, Negotiating International Copyright Protection: The United States and European Community Positions, 2 Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Journal 319. (1992)
• Richard A. Morford, Intellectual Property Protection: A United States Priority, 2 Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 340. (1989)
• Gerald J. Mossinghoff, National Obligations Under Intellectual Property Treaties: The Beginning of a True International Regime, 9 Federal Circuit Bar Journal 591. (2000)
• Richard E. Neff, An I.P. Practitioners Guide to GATT, Vol.2 No.6 The International Computer Lawyer 2. (1994)
• Neil W. Netanel, The Next Round: The Impact of the WIPO Copyright Treaty on TRIPS Dispute-Settlement, 37 Virginia Journal of International Law 441. (1997)
• Ruth Okediji, Toward an International Fair Use Doctrine, 39 Columbia J. of Transnational Law 75. (2000)
• Ralph Oman, Intellectual Property After the Uruguay Round, Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA 18. (1995)
• Adrian Otten, Implementation of the TRIPS Agreement and Prospects for its Further Development, 1 Journal of International Economic Law 523. (1998)
• Adrian Otten, Compliance with TRIPS: The Emerging World View, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 391. (1996)
• Surendra J. Patel, Los derechos de propiedad intelectual en la Ronda de Uruguay, 39 Comercio exterior 288. (1989)
• D. Perkins, International Exhaustion of Intellectual Property Rights, 533 Practicing Law Institute Patents, Copyrights, Trademarks, and Literary Property Course Handbook Series 149 (1998)
• L. Petherbridge, Intelligent TRIPS Implementation: A Strategy for Countries on the CUSP of Development, 22 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 1029. (2001)
• Timothy Pinto, The Influence of The European Convention on Human Rights on Intellectual Property Rights, 24(4) E.I.P.R. 209-219 (2002)
• N. Pires de Carvalho, Requiring Disclosure of the Origin of Genetic Resources and Prior Informed Consent in Patent Applications Without Infringing the TRIPS Agreement: The Problem and the Solution, 2 Washington University Journal of Law and Policy 371 (2000)
• Hamish Porter, European Union Competition Policy: Should the Role of the Collecting Societies Be Legitimised?, 12 E.I.P.R. 672 (1996)
• C. Primo Braga, Technology Transfer In Agricultural Biotechnology: The Developing Country Perspective, In T. Cottier and P. Mavroidis (eds), Intellectual Property Trade, Competition and Sustainable Development. Michigan University Press (2001)
• K. Puri, Cultural Ownership and Intellectual Property Rights Post-Mabo: Putting Ideas into Action, 9 Intell. Prop. J., 293 (1995)
• Srividhya Ragavan, Protection Of Traditional Knowledge, 2 Minnesota Intellectual Property Law Review 1. (2001)
• C. Raghavan, The Final Uruguay Round Package: Thin Gruel for South, Rich Pickings for North, Third World Economics 5 (1992)
• Horacio Rangel-Ortiz, Trademarks, NAFfA and TRIPS-An Update, 75 Trademark World 29 (1995)
• R. T. Rapp, Benefits and Costs of Intellectual Property Protection in Developing Countries, 5 Journal of World Trade 96 (1990)
• Jerome H. Reichman, Bargaining Around the TRIPS Agreement: The Case for Ongoing Public-Private Initiative to Facilitate Worldwide Intellectual property Transactions, 9 Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 11 (1998)
• Jerome H. Reichman, Enforcing the Enforcement Procedure of the TRIPS Agreement, 37 Virginia Journal of International Law 335 (1996)
• Jerome H. Reichman, From Free Riders to Fair Followers: Global Competition Under the TRIPS Agreement, 29 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 11 (1996)
• Jerome H. Reichman, The TRIPS Component of the GATT’s Uruguay Round: Competitive Prospects for Intellectual Property Owners in an Integrated World Market, 4 Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal 171 (1993)
• P.C. Richardson, The Need for Adequate and Effective Protection of Intellectual Property: Perspective of the Private Sector Patents, 2 Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 354 (1989)
• M. Ryan, The Function-Specific and Linkage-Bargain Diplomacy of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking, 19 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 535 (1998)
• B. W. Sadler, Intellectual Property Protection Through International Trade, 2 Houston Journal of International Law 406 (1992)
• Pamela Samuelson, Challenges for the World Intellectual Property Organisation and the Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Council in Regulating Intellectual Property Rights in the Information Age, 21(11) European Intellectual Property Review 578 (1999)
• J. Schmidt-Szalewski, The International protection of Trademarks After the TRIPS Agreement, 9 Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 189 (1998)
• Mary K. Schug, Promoting Access to HIV/AIDS Pharmaceuticals in Sub-Saharan Africa Within the Framework of International Intellectual Property Law, 19 Law and Inequity: A journal of Theory and Practice 229 (2001)
• Robert M. Sherwood, The TRIPS Agreement: Implications for Developing Countries, 37 IDEA 491 (1997)
• Robert M. Sherwood, Patents for Third World inventors : proposals for 21st century improvement, 112 Patent World 25 (1999)
• Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP, Updated Analysis of the Doha Round of Trade Negotiations: New Opportunities & Challenges for Global Business, (2002)
• Esperanza Duran, Intellectual Property Rights and Developing Countries in the WTO Milennium Round, 2:6 J. of World Int. Prop. 853. (1999)
• L. Sindelar, Not So Far After All--International Aspects of the Fairness in Music Licensing Act of 1998, 14 Transnational Lawyer 435 (2001)
• Eric H. Smith, Worldwide Copyright Protection under the TRIPS Agreement, 29 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 559 (1996)
• W.A. Stanback, International Intellectual Property Protection: An Integrated Solution to the Inadequate Protection Problem, 2 Virginia Journal of International Law 528 (1989)
• Arvind Subramanian, Genetic Resources, Biodiversity and Environmental Protection. An Analysis, and Proposals Towards a Solution, 5 Journal of World Trade 105 (1992)
• Arvind Subramanian, The International Economics of Intellectual Property Rights Protection: A Welfare-theoretic Trade Policy Analysis, 8 World Development 947 (1991)
• Arvind Subramanian, TRIPS and the Paradigm of GATT: A Tropical, Temperate View, 4 The World Economy 511 (1990)
• C. Svernlöv, Super 301: Gone but Not Forgotten, 3 Journal of World Trade 125 (1992)
• Amadou Tankoano, L’ accord relatif aux aspects des droits de propriete intellectuelle lies au commerce (TRIPS), 20 Droit et pratique du commerce international 428 (1994)
• V. Tejera, Tripping Over Property Rights: Is it Possible to Reconcile the Convention on Biological Diversity with Article 27 of the TRIPS Agreement?, 33 New England Law Review 967 (1999)
• Timothy P. Trainer, TRIPS Border Measures Implementation: Details to Consider, 74 Trademark World 24 (1995)
• J. Tunney, E. U., I. P., Indigenous People and the Digital Age: Intersecting Circles?, 20 EIPR 336 (1998)
• Ulrich Uchtenhagen, The GATT Negotiations Concerning Copyright and Intellectual Property Protection, 6 I.I.C. 778 (1990)
• S.K. Verma, TRIPS and Plant Variety Protection in Developing Countries, 17(6) E.I.P.R. 281-289 (1995)
• J. Waincymer, Transparency of Dispute Settlement Within the World Trade Organization, 24 Melbourne University Law Review 797 (2000)
• Haris Apostolopoulos, Anti-Competitive Abuse of IP Rights and Compulsory Licensing Through the International Dimension of the TRIPS Agreement and the Stockholm Proposal for its Amendment, 6 Richmond J. of Global Law & Business 265 (2007)
• M.E. Wojcik, The Perilous Process of Protecting Process Patents from Infringing Importations, 2 Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Journal 222 (1992)
• E. Wolfard, International Trade in Intellectual Property: The Emerging GATT Regime, 1 University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review 108 (1991)
• M.D.H. Woodward, TRIPS and NAFTA Chapter 17: How Will Trade-Related Multilateral Agreements Affect International Copyright?, 31 Texas International Law Journal 269 (1996)
• A.A. Yusuf, Intellectual Property Protection and International Trade: Exhaustion of Rights Revisited, 1 World Competition 127 (1992)
• S.D. Ahuja, GATT and TRIPs. The Impat on the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry, Patent World, September, London (1994)
• Paulo Almeida, The new intellectual property regime and its economic impact on developing countries, in Sacerdoti, Giorgio (Ed.), Liberalization of services and intellectual property in the Uruguay Round of GATT, University Press, Fribourg (1990)
• M.P. Bhatnagar, GATT IPP proposals in context with developing countries and the Paris Convention, Patent World, March, London. (1992)
• James L. Bikoff, Intellectual property protection under NAFTA and TRIPs and the future of bilateral intellectual property initiatives. Part I, Patent World, October, London (1994)
• Marco C.E.J. Bronckers, The Impact of TRIPs: intellectual property protectin in developing countries, Common Market Law Review, Vol. 31, No. 6. (1994)
• Pablo Challu, The consequences of pharmaceutical product patenting, World Competition, Vol. 15, No. 2, Geneva. (1991)
• Pablo Challu, Effects of the monopolistic patenting of medicine in Italy since 1978, International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 10, No. 2/3. Great Britain. (1995)
• Shlomo Cohen, GATT TRIPS and character merchandising, Trademark World, June. London. (1993)
• Carlos M. Correa, The GATT Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights: new standards for patent protection, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 16, No. 8. Oxford. (1994)
• Carlos M. Correa, Trends in technology transfer: implications for developing countries, Science and Public Policy, Vol. 21, No. 6. Guildford, UK. (1994)
• Carlos M. Correa, TRIPs Agreement: copyright and related rights, International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law, No. 4. Weinheim. (1994)
• Peter Crockford, GATT Considerations, Trademark World, November. (1993)
• Rajan Dhanjee, Trade related aspects of intellectual property rights (TRIPs): objectives, approaches and basic principles of the GATT and of intellectual property conventions, Journal of World Trade, Vol. 24, No. 5. Geneva. (1990)
• B. Dhar, Trade Relatedness of Intellectual Property Rights: Finding the Real Connections, Paper preseted at the Conference "The International Relations of Intellectual Property: Challenges at the Turn of the Century", American University, Washington D.C. (1995)
• Frank Emmert, Intellectual Property in the Uruguay Round. Negotiating Strategies of the Western Industrialized Countries, Michigan Journal of International Law, Vol. 11, No. 4. (1990)
• Gustavo Ghidini, Prospective Proterzioniste nel Diritto Industriale, Rivista de Diritto Industriale, No. I. Milano. (1995)
• Michael S. Hart, Getting back to basics: reinventing patent law for economic efficiency, Intellectual Property Journal, 8, July (1994)
• Bernard M. Hoekman, Competition, Competition Policy and the GATT, The World Economy, Vol. 17, No. 2 (1994)
• Raphael Kaplinsky, Industry and Intellectual Property Rights in the Uruguay Round and Beyond, The Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 25, No. 3, London. (1989)
• Palitha T.B. Kohona, Dispute Resolution under the World Trade Organization. An Overview, Journal of World Trade, Vol. 28, No. 2, Geneva (1994)
• Baldo Kresalja, El GATT y la Propiedad Intelectual, Analisis Internacional, Centro Peruano de Estudios Internacionales, No. 6/7, Lima. (1994)
• Hans Peter Kunz-Hallstein, The United States proposal for a GATT Agreement on intellectual property and the Paris Convention for the protection of industrial property, Vandervilt Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 22, No. 2. (1989)
• Bruce McDonald, GATT ratification means big changes to US IP Law, Managing Intellectual Property, March, London. (1995)
• Philip C. Mendes de Costa, Canadian patent law under GATT -- what’s coming next?, Canadian Intellectual Property Review, 11. (1994)
• Jerome H. Reichman, Intellectual Property in International Trade: Opportunities and Risks of a GATT Connection, 22 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 747 (1989)
• Susan K. Sell, The origins of a trade-based apporach to intellectual property protections: the role of industry associations, paper presented at the Conference "The International Relations of Intellectual Property: Challenges at the Turn of the Century", American University, Washington D.C. (1995)
• John Slaughter, TRIPs: the GATT intellectual property negotiations approach their conclusion, European Intellectual Property Review, No. 11, Oxford. (1990)
• Arvind Subramanian, Discrimination in international economics of intellectual property right protection, Economic and Political Weekly, March 17, New Delhi. (1990)
• Amadou Tankoano, L’accord relatif aux aspects des droits de propriete intellectuelle lies au commerce, Droit et Pratique du Commerce International, Vol. 20, No. 3, Paris. (1994)
• Ulrich Uchtenhagen, The GATT negotiations concerning copyright and intellectual property protection, International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law, Vol. 21, No. 6, Weinheim. (1990)
• Hans Ullrich, GATT: Industrial Property Protection, Fair Trade and Development, International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law, Vol 19, Weinheim. (1988)
• Martin Voet, Patent practitioners -- don’t let GATT get you, Managing Intellectual Property, March, London. (1995)
• Frances G. Zacher, Pass the Parmesan: Geographic Indications in the United States and the European Union -- Can There be Compromise?, Emory Int’l L. Rev. 427 (2005)
• Leon Ferera, First WTO Decision on Trips: India - Patent Protection for Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Chemical Products, 20(2) E.I.P.R. 69. (1998)
• Charters Macdonald-Brown, WTO: Patents - First IP Case Before WTO to Enforce TRIPS, 19(12) E.I.P.R. D313-314 (1997)
• Elizabeth Henderson, TRIPS and the Third World: The Example of Pharmaceutical Patents in India, 19(11) E.I.P.R. 651-663. (1997)
• Carlos M. Correa, Implementation of the TRIPS Agreement in Latin America and the Caribbean, 19(8) E.I.P.R. 435-443 (1997)
• William Cook, Judicial Review of the EPO and the Direct Effet of TRIPS in the European Community, 19(7) E.I.P.R. 367-374. (1997)
• Zheng Chengsi, TRIPS and Intellectual Property in China, 19(5) E.I.P.R. 243-246. (1997)
• Julia McCormick, The Effect of TRIPS in the Field of Design Right, 19(4) E.I.P.R. 205-207. (1997)
• Nicole Ramcharan, Trinidad and Tobago: Intellectual Property - New Statutes to Comply with TRIPS, 19(3) E.I.P.R. D82-85 (Legislative Comment). (1997)
• Michael Blakeney, The Impact of the TRIPS Agreement in the Asia Pacific Region, 18(10) E.I.P.R. 544-554. (1996)
• Michelle McGrath, The Patent Provisions in TRIPS: Protecting Reasonable Remuneration for Services Rendered - Or the Latest Development in Western Colonialism, 18(7) E.I.P.R. 398-403. (1996)
• Robin M. Bridge, Hong Kong: GATT/TRIPS, 18(2) E.I.P.R. D46-47 (1996)
• S.K. Verma, TRIPS and Plant Variety Protection in Developing Countries, 17(6) E.I.P.R. 281-289. (1995)
• Teruo Doi, Japan: Copyright: Amendment of Copyright Act to Implement TRIPS Agreement, 17(1) E.I.P.R. D-10-12. (1995)
• Teruo Doi, Japan: Legislation: TRIPS Agreement, 17(2) E.I.P.R. D42-45. (1995)
• Michael Blakeney, The GATT Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, 16(11) E.I.P.R. SUPP I-12. (1994)
• Carlos M. Correa, The GATT Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights: New Standards for Patent Protection, 16(8) E.I.P.R. 327-335. (1994)
• Anthony Howard, The State of Play in the Negotiations on TRIPS (GATT/Uruguay Round), 13(5) E.I.P.R. 157-164. (1991)
• Robert Shapiro, Patent Infringement During a Time of National Emergency: Are Canadian, American and Mexican Governments Permitted to Do So under Their Domestic Law, NAFTA and TRPIS; If So at What Cost?, 18 Windsor Rev. Legal & Soc. Issues 37 (2004)
• Kevin J. Nowak, Staying Wthin The Negotiated Framework: Abiding by the Non-Discrimination Clause in TRIPS Article 27, 26 Michigan J. Int’l L. 899. (2005)
• Alain J. Lapter, The WTO’s Dispute Resulution Mechanism: Does the United States Take It Seriously? A TRIPS Analysis, 4 Chicago-Kent J. Intell. Prop. 217. (2005)
• Anthony P. Valach, Jr., Trips: Protecting The Rights of Patent Holders And Addressing Public Health Issues In Developing Countries, 4 Chicago-Kent J. Intell. Prop. 156. (2005)
• Lina M. Monten, The Inconsistency Between Section 301 and TRIPS: Counterproductive with Respect to the Future of International Protection of Intellectual Property Rights?, 9 Marquette Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 387 (2005)
• Jinghua Zou, Rice and Cheese, Anyone? The Fight over TRIPS Geographical Indications Continues, 30 Brooklyn J. Int’l L. 1141 (2005)
• LiLan Ren, A Comparison of 28 U.S.C. 1498(A) and Foreign Statutes and an Analysis of 1498(A)’s Compliance with TRIPS and Public Health, 41 Houston L. Rev. 1659. (2005)
• Rahul Rajkumar, The Central American Free Trade Agreement: An End Run around the Doha Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health, 15 Albany L.J. Sci. & Tech. 433. (2005)
• John C. Knapp, Laugh, And the Whole World . . . Scowls At You?: A Defense of the United States’ Fair Use Exception for Parody under TRIPS, 33 Denver J. Int’l L. & Pol’y 347. (2005)
• Daniel Gervais, Traditional Knowledge & Intelectual Property: A Trips-Compatible Approach, Michigan St. L. Rev. 137 (2005)
• David Vaver, Unconventional and Well-Known Trade Marks, Sing. J. Legal Stud. 1 (2005)
• Paul J. Heald, American Corporate Copyright: A Brilliant, Uncoordinated Plan, 12 J. Intell. Prop. L. 489 (2005)
• Becki Graham, TRIPS: Ten Years Later: Compromise Or Conflict Over Geographical Indications, Syracuse Sci. & Tech. L. Rep. 4 (2005)
• Manesh Jiten Shah, Problems with Sharing the Pirates’ Booty: An Analysis of TRIPS, the Copyright Divide Between the United States and China & Two Potential Solutions, 5 Richmond J. Global L. & Bus. 69. (2005)
• Tunisia L. Staten, Geographical Indications Protection under the TRIPS Agreement: Uniformity Not Extension, 87 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc’y 221 (2005)
• Frederick M. Abbott, Toward a New Era of Objective Assessment in the Field of TRIPS and Variable Geometry for the Preservation of Multilateralism, 8 J. Int’l Econ. L. 77. (2005)
• Nuno Pires De Carvalho, From the Shaman’s Hut To The Patent Office: In Search Of A Trips-Consistent Requirement To Disclose The Origin Of Genetic Resources And Prior Informed Consent, 17 Washington Univ. J.L. & Pol’y 111. (2005)
• Ben Hattenbach, GATT, TRIPs and the small American inventor: an evaluation of the effort to preserve domestic technological innovation, 10 I.P.J. 61 (1995)
• Robert Druzeta, Canada gets the short end of the TRIPS stick, 9 Appeal 6. (2003)
• Christopher Kent, The Uruguay Round GATT TRIPS agreement & Chapter 17 of the NAFTA: a new era in international patent protection, 10 C.I.P. Rev. 711 (1994)
• Georges Azzaria, Les brevets pharmaceutiques et l’acces aux medicaments, in Christian Deblock (ed) L’organisation mondiale du commerce: Ou s’en va la mondialisation? (Montreal : Fides, 2002). (2002)
• Md. Golam Robbani, Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights and Least Developed Countries, 8:4 J. of World Int. Prop. 565. (2005)
• Olena V. Antonyuk, Meeting TRIPS Commitments in Ukraine - An Important Challenge in the Quest for WTO Accession, 8:3 J. of World Int. Prop. 271. (2005)
• Ingo Meitinger, Implementation of Test Data Protection According to Article 39.3 TRIPS - The Search for a Fair Interpretation of the Term "Unfair Commercial Use", 8:2 J. of World Int. Prop. 123 (2005)
• Assafa Endeshaw, Asian Perspectives on Post-TRIPS Issues in Intellectual Property, 8:2 J. of World Int. Prop. 2. (2005)
• Dilip K. Das, Intellectual Property Rights and the Doha Round, 8:1 J. of World Int. Prop. 33. (2005)
• David Price, The U.S. - Bahrain Free Trade Agreement and Intellectual Property Protection, 7:6 J. of World Int. Prop. 829. (2004)
• Ramesh Bikram Karky, Nepal’s Accession to the World Trade Organization - Legislative Enactments in Compliance with the TRIPS Agreement, 7:6 J. of World Int. Prop. 891. (2004)
• Vandana Shiva, TRIPS, Human Rights and the Public Domain, 7:5 J. of World Int. Prop. 665. (2004)
• M. Rafiqul Islam, The Generic Drug Deal of the WTO from Doha to Cancun - A Peripheral Response to a Perennial Conundrum, 7:5 J. of World Int. Prop. 675. (2004)
• Gionathan Curci, Improving Access to Life-Saving Patented Drugs - Between Cumpolusory Licensing and Differential Pricing, 7:5 J. of World Int. Prop. 739. (2004)
• Martin A. Girsberger, Transparency Measures under Patent Law regarding Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge - Disclosure of Source and Evidence of Prior Informed Consent and Benefit-Sharing, 7:4 J. of World Int. Prop. 451 (2004)
• Jane Bullbrook, Geographical Indications within GATT, 7:4 J. of World Int. Prop. 501. (2004)
• Marcelo Dias Varella, The WTO, Intellectual Property and AIDS - Case Studies from Brazil and South Africa, 7:4 J. of World Int. Prop. 523. (2004)
• Elena Ghanotakis, How the U.S. Interpretation of Flexibilities Inherent in TRIPS affects Access to Medicines for Developing Countries, 7:3 J. of World Int. Prop. 287. (2004)
• Jose Manuel Cortes Martin, The WTO TRIPS Agreement - The Battle between the Old and the New World over the Protection of Geographical Indications, 7:3 J. of World Int. Prop. 287-326 (2004)
• Daya Shanker, The Paragraph 6 Solution of the Doha Public Health Declaration and Export under the TRIPS Agreement, 7:3 J. of World Int. Prop. 365. (2004)
• Paul Kuruk, Bridging the Gap between Traditional Knowledge and Intellectual Property Rights -- Is Reciprocity an Answer?, 7:3 J. of World Int. Prop. 429. (2004)
• Tshimanga Kongolo, Compulsory Licence Issues in African Arab Countries, 7:2 J. of World Int. Prop. 185 (2004)
• K.M. Gopakumar, The WTO Deal on Cheap Drugs -- A Critique, 7:1 J. of World Int. Prop. 99. (2004)
• Ituku Elangi Botoy, From the Paris Convention to the TRIPS Agreement -- A One-Hundred-and-Twelve-Year Tansitional Period for the Industrialized Countries, 7:1 J. of World Int. Prop. 115 (2004)
• Paul Vandoren, The WTO Decision on Paragraph 6 of the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health -- Making it Work, 6:6 J. of World Int. Prop. 779. (2003)
• Guido Westkamp, TRIPS Principles, Reciprocity and the Creation of Sui-Generis-Type Intellectual Property Rights for New Forms of Technology, 6:6 J. of World Int. Prop. 827. (2003)
• Bernard O’Connor, Protecting Traditional Knowledge - An Overview of a Developing Area of Intellectual Property Law, 6:5 J. of World Int. Prop. 677. (2003)
• Peter H. Kang, IP, Trade, and U.S./Singapore Relations -- Significant Intellectual Property Provisions of the 2003 U.S. - Singapore Free Trade Agreement, 6:5 J. of World Int. Prop. 721. (2003)
• Ida Madieha, TRIPS Compliance in Malaysia -- The Legislative Response, 6:5 J. of World Int. Prop. 745. (2003)
• Klaus Stegemann, The TRIPS Agreement as an Alliance for Knowledge Production -- The Funding of Pharmaceutical Innovation, 6:5 J. of World Int. Prop. 529. (2003)
• Peter Rott, Genetically Modified Products and Consumer Concerns under WTO Law, 6:5 J. of World Int. Prop. 571. (2003)
• Deli Yang, The WTO and Trademark Development in China, 6:4 J. of World Int. Prop. 633. (2003)
• Faizel Ismail, The Doha Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health and the Negotiations in the WTO on Paragraph 6 - Why PhRMA Needs to Join the Consensus!, 6:3 J. of World Int. Prop. 393. (2003)
• Gavin Goh, Precaution, Science and Sovereignty -- Protecting Life and Health under the WTO Agreements, 6:3 J. of World Int. Prop. 441. (2003)
• Sandra Bartelt, Compulsory Licences Pursuant to TRIPS Article 31 in the Light of the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, 6:2 J. of World Int. Prop. 283. (2003)
• E. Richard Gold, Balancing Trade in Patents -- Public Non-Commercial Use and Compulsory Licensing, 6:2 J. of World Int. Prop. 5. (2003)
• Somesh K. Mathur, Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights and Copyright Provisions -- Some Issues with Special Reference to Developing Countries, 6:1 J. of World Int. Prop. 65. (2003)
• Lucas R. Arrivillaga, An International Standard of Protection for Test Data Submitted to Authorities to Obtain Marketing Authorization for Drugs -- TRIPS Article 39.3, 6:1 J. of World Int. Prop. 139. (2003)
• Daya Shanker, Legitimacy and the TRIPS Agreement, 6:1 J. of World Int. Prop. 155. (2003)
• Jacques H.J. Bourgeois, Implementing Paragraph 6 of the Doha Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health -- The Waiver Solution, 5:6 J. of World Int. Prop. 835. (2002)
• Felix Addor, Geographical Indications beyond Wines and Spirits -- A Roadmap for a Better Protection for Geographical Indications in the WTO TRIPS Agreement, 5:6 J. of World Int. Prop. 865. (2002)
• Domenico Sindico, On Parallel Importation, TRIPS and European Court of Justice Decisions, 5:4 J. of World Int. Prop. 505 (2002)
• Saadia M. Pekkanen, Japan’s Legal Actions in the GATT/WTO System, 5:4 J. of World Int. Prop. 565. (2002)
• Nick M. Covelli, Due Process, Judicial Economy and Procedural Rights -- Non-Disputing Member Participation in WTO Disputes, 5:4 J. of World Int. Prop. 591. (2002)
• Daya Shanker, India, the Pharmaceutical Industry and the Validity of TRIPS, 5:4 J. of World Int. Prop. 315. (2002)
• Daya Shanker, Brazil, the Pharmaceutical Industry and the WTO, 5:1 J. of World Int. Prop. 53. (2002)
• Annie S.T. Tsoi, A New Era for PRC Trade-Mark Protection -- The 2001 Amendments and the TRIPS Agreement, 5:3 J. of World Int. Prop. 395. (2002)
• Hong Xue, The TRIPS Agreement and the Second Revision of the Chinese Trademark Law, 5:3 J. of World Int. Prop. 291. (2002)
• Paul Vandoren, Medicaments sans Frontieres? Clarification of the Relationship between TRIPS and Public Health resulting from the WTO Doha Ministerial Declaration, 5:1 J. of World Int. Prop. 5. (2002)
• Frederick M. Abbott, The TRIPS Agreement, Access to Medicines, and the WTO Doha Ministerial Conference, 5:1 J. of World Int. Prop. 15. (2002)
• Peter Drahos, BITS and BIPS -- Bilateralism in Intellectual Property, 4:6 J. of World Int. Prop. 791. (2001)
• George S.A. Szabo, TRIPS and the Question of "Invisible" Process Infringement -- Relevant Litigations in Hungary, 4:6 J. of World Int. Prop. 905. (2001)
• Ida Madieha Azmi, TRIPS, Patents, Technology Transfer, Foreign Direct Investment and the Pharmaceutical Industry in Malaysia, 4:6 J. of World Int. Prop. 609. (2001)
• Tshimanga Kongolo, Public Interest versus the Pharmaceutical Industry’s Monopoly in South Africa, 4:5 J. of World Int. Prop. 609. (2001)
• David Vivas-Eugui, Negotiations on Geographical Indications in the TRIPS Council and their Effect on the WTO Agricultural Negotiations -- Implications for Developing Countries and the Case of Venezuela, 4:5 J. of World Int. Prop. 703. (2001)
• Richard P. Rozek, Broad-Based Compulsory Licensing of Pharmaceutical Technologies -- Unsound Public Policy, 4:4 J. of World Int. Prop. 463 (2001)
• Carlos M. Correa, Pro-Competitive Measures under the TRIPS Agreement to Promote Technology Diffusion in Developing Countries, 4:4 J. of World Int. Prop. 481. (2001)
• Paul Vandoren, The TRIPS Agreement: A Rising Star?, 4:3 J. of World Int. Prop. 307. (2001)
• Arvind Subramanian, The AIDS Crisis, Differential Pricing of Drugs, and the TRIPS Agreement -- Two Proposals, 4:3 J. of World Int. Prop. 323. (2001)
• Somesh K. Mathur, Domestic Challenges and the TRIPS Agreement -- The Way Forward for India, 4:3 J. of World Int. Prop. 337. (2001)
• Ruwantissa I.R. Abeyratne, Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights in a Liberalized Air Transport Industry, 4:3 J. of World Int. Prop. 383. (2001)
• Dara Williams, Developing TRIPS Jurisprudence -- The First Six Years and Beyond, 4:2 J. of World Int. Prop. 177. (2001)
• John Mo, Reform of the Patent System of the PRC after WTO, 4:1 J. of World Int. Prop. 33. (2001)
• Xiang Yu, The Second Amendment of the Chinese Patent Law and the Comparison between the New Patent Law and TRIPS, 4:1 J. of World Int. Prop. 137 (2001)
• Joseph Straus, Reversal of the Burden of Proof, the Principle of “Fair and Equitable Procedures” and Preliminary Injunctions under the Trips Agreement, 3:6 J. of World Int. Prop. 807. (2000)
• Gail E. Evans, A Preliminary Excursion into TRIPS and Non-Violation Complaints, 3:6 J. of World Int. Prop. 867. (2000)
• Olivier Cattaneo, The Interpretation of the TRIPS Agreement -- Considerations for the WTO Panels and Appellate Body, 3:5 J. of World Int. Prop. 627. (2000)
• Tshimanga Kongolo, The New OAPI Agreement as Revised in February 1999 -- Complying with TRIPS, 3:5 J. of World Int. Prop. 717. (2000)
• Robert Howse, The Canadian Generic Medicines Panel -- A Dangerous Precedent in Dangerous Times, 3:4 J. of World Int. Prop. 493. (2000)
• Daniel J. Gervais, The TRIPS Agreement after Seattle -- Implementation and Dispute Settlement Issues, 3:4 J. of World Int. Prop. 509. (2000)
• N. Ayse Odman, Using TRIPS to Make the Innovation Process Work, 3:3 J. of World Int. Prop. 343. (2000)
• Jai Prakash Mishra, Biodiversity, Biotechnology and Intellectual Property Rights -- Implications for Indian Agriculture, 3:2 J. of World Int. Prop. 211. (2000)
• Jayashree Watal, TRIPS and the 1999 WTO Millenium Round -- Some Reflections on Future Issues related to IPRs in the WTO and the Way Forward for Developing Countries, 3:1 J. of World Int. Prop. 3. (2000)
• Arvind Subramanian, Putting some Numbers on the TRIPs Pharmaceutical Debate, 10 (No. 2/3) International J. of Tech. Management, Special Issue, pp. 252-268. (1995)
• South Centre, The TRIPs Agreement. A Guide for the South. The Uruguay Round Agreement on Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights, South Centre. (1997)
• Frederick Abbott, Compulsory Licensing for Public Health Needs: The TRIPs Agenda at the WTO after the Doha Declaration on Public Health, Occasional Paper 9. (2002)
• Carlos M. Correa, Traditional Knowledge and Intellectual Property: Issues and Options Surrounding the Protection of Traditional Knowledge, QUNO Discussion paper. (2001)
• Brian T. Liberis, Compulsory Licensing and the TRIPS Agreement: A Solution to High Drug Prices in the United States?, 28 Suffolk Transnat’l L. Rev. 57. (2004)
• Elaine B. Gin, International Copyright Law: Beyond the WIPO & TRIPS Debate, 86 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc’y 763. (2004)
• Donald P. Harris, TRIPS Rebound: An Historical Analysis of How the TRIPS Agreement Can Ricochet Back against the United States, 25 Northwestern J. Int’l L. & Bus. 99. (2004)
• Jessica J. Fayerman, The Spirit of TRIPS and the Importation of Medicines Made Under Compulsory License after the August 2003 Trips Council Agreement, 25 Northwestern J. Int’l L. & Bus. 257 (2004)
• Robert Weissman, A Long, Strange TRIPS: The Pharmaceutical Industry Drive to Harmonize Global Intellectual Property Rules, and the Remaining WTO Legal Alternatives Available to Third World Countries, 25 U. Pennsylvania J. Int’l Econ. L. 1079. (2004)
• Geoff Tansey, Trade, Intellectual Property, Food and Biodiversity: Key Issues and Options for the 1999 review of Article 27.3(b) of the TRIPS Agreement, QUNO Discussion paper, February 1999. (1999)
• Geoff Tansey, Food Security, Biotechnology and Intellectual Property: Unpacking some Issues around TRIPS, QUNO Discussion Paper, July 2002. (2002)
• Lee Petherbridge, Intelligent TRIPS Implementation: A Strategy for Countries on the Cusp of Development, 25 U. Pennsylvania J. Int’l Econ. L. 1133 (2004)
• Frederick M. Abbott, Are the Competition Rules in the WTO TRIPS Agreement Adequate?, 7 J. Int’l Econ. L. 687. (2004)
• Erik B. Bluemel, Substance Without Process: Analyzing TRIPS Participatory Guarantees in Light of Protected Indigenous Rights, 86 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc’y 671. (2004)
• Markus Nolff, The Expanded International Search Procedure: What Will Be the Next Step in View of TRIPS?, 86 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc’y 717. (2004)
• Amit Gupta, Patent Rights on Pharmaceutical Products and Affordable Drugs: Can TRIPS Provide a Solution?, 2 Buffalo Intell. Prop. L.J. 127. (2004)
• Aaron Xavier Fellmeth, Secrecy, Monopoly, and Access to Pharmaceuticals in International Trade Law: Protection of Marketing Approval Data under the TRIPS Agreement, 45 Harvard Int’l L.J. 443. (2004)
• Bryan C. Mercurio, TRIPS, Patents, and Access to Life-Saving Drugs in the Developing World, 8 Marquette Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 211. (2004)
• Jennifer May Rogers, The TRIPS Council’s Solution to the Paragraph 6 Problem: Toward Compulsory Licensing Viability for Developing Countries, 13 Minnesota J. Global Trade 443. (2004)
• Susan Scafidi, The "Good Old Days" of TRIPS: The U.S. Trade Agenda and the Extension of Pharmaceutical Test Data Protection, 4 Yale J. Health Pol’y, L. & Ethics 341. (2004)
• Hanns Ullrich, Expansionist Intellectual Property Protection and Reductionist Competition Rules: A TRIPS Perspective, 7 J. Int’l Econ. L. 401. (2004)
• Gregory Shaffer, Recognizing Public Goods in WTO Dispute Settlement: Who Participates? Who Decides? The Case of TRIPS and Pharmaceutical Patent Protection, 7 J. Int’l Econ. L. 459. (2004)
• Srividhya Ragavan, The Jekyll and Hyde Story of International Trade: The Supreme Court in Phrma v. Walsh and the TRIPS Agreement, 38 U. Richmond L. Rev. 777. (2004)
• Claudia Schulz, The TRIPS Agreement and Intellectual Property Protection in Brazil, 98 Am. Soc’y Int’l L. Proc. 100. (2004)
• Jacqueline Nanci Land, Global Intellectual Property Protection as Viewed through the European Community’s Treatment of Geographical Indications: What Lessons Can TRIPS Learn?, 11 Cardozo J. Int’l & Comp. L. 1007. (2004)
• Rishi Gupta, TRIPS Compliance: Dealing with the Consequences of Drug Patents in India, 26 Houston J. Int’l L. 599. (2004)
• Markus Nolff, Paragraph 6 of the Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health and the Decision of the WTO Regarding its Implementation: An "Expeditious Solution"?, 86 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc’y 291. (2004)
• Jennifer Berman, Using the Doctrine of Informed Consent to Improve HIV Vaccine Access in the Post-TRIPS Era, 22 Wisconsin Int’l L.J. 273. (2004)
• Duncan Matthews, WTO Decision on Implementation of Paragraph 6 of the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health: A Solution to the Access to Essential Medicines Problem?, 7 J. Int’l Econ. L. 73. (2004)
• Duncan Matthews, TRIPS Plexibilities and Access to Mecidines in Developing Countries: The Problem with Technical Assistance and Free Trade Agreements, 27(11) E.I.P.R. 420-427. (2005)
• Haochen Sun, The Road to Doha and Beyond: Some Reflections on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, 15 Eur. J. Int’l L. 123. (2004)
• Graeme B. Dinwoodie, TRIPS and the Dynamics of Intellectual Property Lawmaking, 36 Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 95 (2004)
• Graeme B. Dinwoodie, Towards an International Framework for the Protection of Traditional Knowledge, ELEMENTS OF NATIONAL SUI GENERIS SYSTEMS FOR THE PRESERVATION, PROTECTION AND PROMOTION OF TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE: INNOVATIONS AND PRACTICES AND OPTIONS FOR AN INTERNATIONAL FRAMEWORK, Twarog & Turner, (2005)
• Rochelle C. Dreyfuss, TRIPS-Round II: Should Users Strike Back?, 71 U. Chicago L. Rev. 21. (2004)
• Laurence R. Helfer, Regime Shifting: The TRIPS Agreement and New Dynamics of International Property Lawmaking, 29 Yale J. Int’l L. 1. (2004)
• Laurence R. Helfer, Intellectual Property Rights in Plant Varieties: International Legal Regimes and Policy Options for National Governments, Food and Agriculture Org. of the United Nations, FAO Legislative Study, No. 85, (2004)
• Jonathan Mark W.W. Chu, Not Enought? An Examination of China’s Compliance with the Intentions of the TRIPS Accord, 8 Vindobona Journal of International Commercial Law & Arbitration (Aus.) 281. (2004)
• Kevin M. Murphy, Conflict, Confusion, and Bias under TRIPS Articles 22-24, 19 American Univ. Int’l L. Rev. 1181. (2004)
• Jose Manuel Cortes Martin, TRIPS Agreement: Towards a Better Protection for Geographical Indications?, 30 Brooklyn J. Int’l L. 117. (2004)
• Thomas F. Cotter, Market Fundamentalism and the TRIPS Agreement, 22 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J. 307. (2004)
• Kristen M. Koepsel, How Do Developed Countries Meet their Obligations under Article 67 of the TRIPS Agreement?, 44 IDEA 167. (2004)
• Brook K. Baker, Arthritic Flexibilities for Accessing Medicines: Analysis of WTO Action Regarding Paragraph 6 of the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, 14 Indiana Int’l & Comp. L. Rev. 613. (2004)
• Paul J. Heald, Mowing the Playing Field: Addressing Information Distortion and Asymmetry in the TRIPS Game, 88 Minnesota L. Rev. 249. (2003)
• Lisa M. Brownlee, Trademark Law in Belize: Implementation of GATT TRIPS in a Developing Country, 93 Trademark Rep. 1414. (2003)
• Mohamed Omar Gad, Impact of Multinational Enterprises on Multilateral Rule Making: The Pharmaceutical Industry and the TRIPS Uruguay Round Negotiations, 9 L. & Bus. Rev. Am. 667. (2003)
• Robin J. Effron, Secrets and Spies: Extraterritorial Application of the Economic Espionage Act and the TRIPS Agreement, 78 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1475. (2003)
• G. Lee Skillington, The Protection of Test and Other Data Required by Article 39.3 of the TRIPS Agreement, 24 Nw. J. Int’l L. & Bus. 1. (2003)
• Erin Kathleen Bender, North and South: The WTO, TRIPS, and the Scourge of Biopiracy, 11 Tulsa J. Comp. & Int’l L. 281. (2003)
• Carlos M. Correa, TRIPS and Access to Drugs: Toward a Solution for Developing Countries without Manufacturing Capacity?, 17 Emory Int’l L. Rev. 389. (2003)
• Julian Fleet, U.N. Approach to Access to Essential AIDS Medications, Intellectual Property Law and the WTO TRIPS Agreement, 17 Emory Int’l L. Rev. 451. (2003)
• Amir Attaran, Assessing and Answering Paragraph 6 of the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health: The Case of Greater Flexibility and a Non-Justiciability Solution, 17 Emory Int’l L. Rev. 743. (2003)
• Margo A. Bagley, Legal Movements in Intellectual Property: TRIPS, Unilateral Action, Bilateral Agreements, and HIV/AIDS, 17 Emory Int’l L.Reb. 781. (2003)
• Ruth L. Okediji, Public Welfare and the Role of the WTO: Reconsidering the TRIPS Agreement, 17 Emory Int’l L. Rev. 819. (2003)
• Irene Ribeiro Dubowy, Subsidies Code, TRIPS Agreement, and Technological Development: Some Considerations for Developing Countries, 8 J. Tech. L. & Pol’y 33. (2003)
• Ruay Lian Ho, Compliance and Challenges Faced by the Chinese Patent System under TRIPS, 85 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc’y 504. (2003)
• Aditi Bagchi, Compulsory Licensing and the Duty of Good Faith in TRIPS, 55 Stan. L. Rev. 1529. (2003)
• Sol Picciotto, Private Rights vs. Public Interests in the TRIPS Agreement, 97 Am. Soc’y Int’l L. Proc. 167. (2003)
• Steven A. Bowers, Location, Location, Location: The Case against Extending Geographical Indication Protection Under the TRIPS Agreement, 31 AIPLA Quarterly Journal 129. (2003)
• Zita Lazzarini, Making Access to Pharmaceuticals a Reality: Legal Options under TRIPS and the Case of Brazil, 6 Yale Hum. Rts. & Dev. L.J. 103. (2003)
• Stephen Barnes, Pharmaceutical Patents and TRIPS: A Comparison of India and South Africa, 91 Kentucky L.J. 911. (2003)
• Manavinder Singh Bains, Software, Soveriegnty and the Internet: Circumventing Chaos through TRIPS, 4 Columbia Sci. & Tech. L. Rev. 1. (2003)
• Daniel Erlikhman, Jazz Photo and the Doctrine of Patent Exhaustion: Implications to TRIPS and International Harmonization of Patent Protection, 25 Hastings Comm. & Ent. L.J. 274. (2003)
• Nermien Al-Ali, The Egyptian Pharmaceutical Industry after TRIPS -- A Practitioner’s View, 26 Fordham Int’l L.J. 274. (2003)
• L. Danielle Tully, Prospects For Progress: The TRIPS Agreement and Developing Countries after the Doha Conference, 26 Boston College Int’l & Comp. L. Rev. 129. (2003)
• Anon, Tackling Global Software Piracy under TRIPS: Insights from International Relations Theory, 116 Harv. L. Rev. 1139. (2003)
• Philippe Zylberg, Geographical Indications v. Trademarks: The Lisbon Agreement: A Violation of TRIPS?, 11 U. Baltimore Intell. Prop. L.J. 1. (2003)
• Zhang Naigen, Dispute Settlement under the TRIPS Agreement from the Perspective of Treaty Interpretation, 17 Temple Int’l & Comp. L.J. 199. (2003)
• Robert Dufresne, Assessing Clashes and Interplays of Regimes from a Distributive Perspective: IP Rights under the Strengthened Embargo against Cuba and the Agreement on TRIPS, 24 Michigan J. Int’l L. 767. (2003)
• Evans Andrew, Taming the Counterfeit Dragon: The WTO, TRIPS and Chinese Amendments to Intellectual Property Laws, 31 Georgia J. Int’l & Comp. L. 587. (2003)
• Warren Newberry, Copyright Refom in China: A "TRIPS" Much Shorter and Less Strange than Imagined?, 21 Boston University Int’l L.J. 101. (2003)
• Haochen Sun, A Wider Access to Patented Drugs under the TRIPS Agreement, 21 Boston University Int’l L.J. 101. (2003)
• Ramesh Bikram Karky, Trademark under the Nepalese Legal System: A Comparative Study with the TRIPS Agreement, 9 Ann. Surv. Int’l & Comp. L. 111. (2003)
• F. M. Scherer, WTO Post-TRIPS Options for Access to Patented Medicines in Developing Nations, 5 J. Int’l Econ. L. 913. (2002)
• Thomas A. Haag, TRIPS Since Doha: How Far Will the WTO Go toward Modifying the Terms for Compulsory Licensing?, 84 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc’y 945. (2002)
• Johanna Kiehl, TRIPS Article 31(B) and the HIV/AIDS Epidemic, 10 J. Intell. Prop. L. 143. (2002)
• Peter Drahos, Intellectual Property, Corporate Strategy, Globalisation: TRIPS in Context, 20 Wisconsin Int’l L.J. 451. (2002)
• Susan K. Sell, TRIPS and the Access to Medicines Campaign, 20 Wisconsin Int’l L.J. 481. (2002)
• Paul Champ, Patent Rights and Local Working under the WTO TRIPS Agreement: An Analysis of the U.S.-Brazil Patent Dispute, 27 Yale J. Int’l L. 365. (2002)
• Frederick M. Abbott, The Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health: Lighting a Dark Corner at the WTO, 5 J. Int’l Econ. L. 469. (2002)
• Jose Felgueroso, TRIPS and the Dispute Settlement Understanding: The First Six Years, 30 AIPLA Quarterly Journal 165. (2002)
• Susan K. Sell, Industry Strategies For Intellectual Property And Trade: The Quest For Trips, And Post-Trips Strategies, 10 Cardozo J. Int’l & Comp. L. 79. (2002)
• Ellen ’t Hoen, TRIPS, Pharmaceutical Patents, and Access to Essential Medicines: A Long Way from Seattle to Doha, 3 Chicago J. Int’l L. 27. (2002)
• Alan O. Sykes, TRIPS, Pharmaceuticals, Developing Countries, and the Doha "Solution", 3 Chicago J. Int’l L. 47. (2002)
• Carlos M. Correa, Unfair Competition under the TRIPS Agreement: Protection of Data Submitted for the Registration of Pharmaceuticals, 3 Chicago J. Int’l L. 69. (2002)
• Susan K. Sell, Post-TRIPS Developments: The Tension between Commercial and Social Agendas in the Context of Intellectual Property, 14 Florida J. Int’l L. 193. (2002)
• Amir Attaran, The Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, Access to Pharmaceuticals, and Options under WTO Law, 12 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 859. (2002)
• Amir H. Khoury, Well-Known and Famous Trademarks in Israel: TRIPS from Manhattan to the Dawn of the New Millenium!, 15 Harvard J.L. & Tech. 291. (2002)
• Jean O. Lanjouw, A New Global Patent Regime for Diseases: U.S. and International Legal Issues, 16(1) Harvard Journal of Law & Technology (2002)
• Kurt M. Saunders, Patent Nonuse and the Role of Public Interest as a Deterrent to Technology Suppression, 15(2) Harvard Journal of Law & Technology (2002)
• Ruixue Ran, Well-Known Trademark Protection in China: Before and after the TRIPS Amendments to China’s Trademark Law, 19 UCLA Pac. Basin L.J. 231. (2002)
• Carmen Otero Garcia-Castrillon, An Approach to the WTO Ministerial Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, 5 J. Int’l Econ. L. 212. (2002)
• Markus Nolff, Compulsory Patent Licensing in view of the WTO Ministerial Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, 84 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc’y 133. (2002)
• Aaron D. Charfoos, How Far Have We Come, and Where Do We Go From Here: The Status of Global Computer Software Protection under the TRIPS Agreement, 22 Northwestern J. Int’l L. & Bus. 261. (2002)
• Peng Jiang, Fighting the AIDS Epidemic: China’s Options under the WTO TRIPS Agreement, 13 Albany L.J. Sci. & Tech. 223. (2002)
• Joel W. Rogers, Is Section 337 Consistent with the GATT and the TRIPS Agreement?, 17 American University Int’l L. Rev. 459. (2002)
• Divya Murthy, The Future of Compulosry Licensing: Deciphering the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, 17 American University Int’l L. Rev. 1299. (2002)
• Naomi A. Bass, Implications of the TRIPS Agreement for Developing Countries: Pharmaceutical Patent Laws in Brazil and South Africa in the 21st Century, 34 George Washington Int’l L. Rev. 191. (2002)
• Silvia Fabiana Faerman, Argentina: The New Patent Law and the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), 8 Southwestern J. of Law and Trade in the Americas 157. (2002)
• Patrick L. Wojahn, A Conflict of Rights: Intellectual Property under TRIPS, The Right to Health, and AIDS Drugs, 6 UCLA J. Int’l L. & Foreign Aff. 463. (2002)
• Ruth Okediji, Trips Dispute Settlement and the Sources of (International) Copyright Law, 49 J. of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A. 585. (2001)
• Kara M. Bombach, Can South Africa Fight AIDS? Reconciling the South African Medicines and Related Substances Act with the TRIPS Agreement, 19 Boston University Int’l L.J. 273. (2001)
• Mary LaFrance, Congress TRIPS Over International Law: WTO Finds Unfairness in Music Licensing Act, 11 DePaul-LCA Journal of Art and Entertainment L. 397. (2001)
• Susan Vastano Vaughn, Compulsory Licensing of Pharmaceuticals under TRIPS: What Standard of Compensation?, 25 Hastings Int’l & Comp. L. Rev. 87. (2001)
• Sarah E. Henry, The First International Challenge to U.S. Copyright Law: What Does the WTO Analysis of 17 U.S.C. 110(5) Mean to the Future International Harmonization of Copyright Laws under the TRIPS Agreement?, 20 Penn State International L.R. 301. (2001)
• Markus Nolff, TRIPS, PCT and Global Patent Procurement, 83 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc’y 479. (2001)
• Dale L. Carlson, Trapped by TRIPS? Intellectual Property Rights, the Cold War, and the Cuban Embargo Revisited, 21 Quinnipiac L.R. 43. (2001)
• Rochelle C. Dreyfuss, Coming of Age with TRIPS: A Comment On J.H. Reichman, The Trips Agreement Comes of Age: Conflict or Cooperation with the Developing Countries?, 33 Case Western Reserve J. Int’l L. 179. (2001)
• Kimberly A. Czub, Argentina’s Emerging Standard of Intellectual Property Protection: A Case Study of the Underlying Conflicts between Developing Countries, TRIPS Standards, and the United States, 33 Case Western Reserve. J. Int’l L. 191. (2001)
• Graham Dutfield, TRIPS-Related Aspects of Traditional Knowledge, 33 Case Western Reserve J. Int’l L. 233. (2001)
• Mariko Kunimi, TRIPS Agreement, Is It Really Successful Achievement in the WTO?, 3 Oregon Rev. Int’l L. 46. (2001)
• Frederick M. Abbott, The TRIPS-Legality of Measures Taken to Address Public Health Crises: A Synopsis, 7 Widener L. Symp. J. 71. (2001)
• John A. Harrelson, TRIPS, Pharmaceutical Patents, and the HIV/AIDS Crisis: Finding the Proper Balance between Intellectual Property Rights and Compassion, 7 Widener L. Symp. 175. (2001)
• Muria Kruger, Harmonizing TRIPS and the CBD: A Proposal from India, 10 Minnesota J. Global Trade 169. (2001)
• Cecily Anne Snyder, Can the United States Meet its Obligation to Protect Intellectual Property Rights under the International GATT/TRIPS Agreement after the Florida Prepaid Cases?, 35 University of San Francisco L. Rev. 407. (2001)
• Rama John Ruppenthal, TRIPS through the Far East: High Tech Product Piracy and the Need for Alternative Regional Solutions, 20 Wisconsin Int’l L.J. 143. (2001)
• John H. Barton, The Economics of TRIPS: International Trade in Information-Intensive Prodcuts, 33 George Washington International L. Rev. 473. (2001)
• Gustavo Bravo, From Paris Convention To TRIPS: A Brief History, 12 J. Contemp. Legal Issues 445. (2001)
• May L. Harris, TRIPS: Historical Overview And Basic Principles, 12 J. Contemp. Legal Issues 454. (2001)
• Dave Sanjeev, TRIPS: International Trademark Law That Promotes Global Trade, 12 J. Contemp. Legal Issues 458. (2001)
• Harun Kazmi, Does It Make a Difference where that Chablis Comes From? Geographic Indications in TRIPS and NAFTA, 12 J. Contemp. Legal Isues 470. (2001)
• Shira Perlmutter, Copyright and International TRIPS Compliance, 8 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 83. (2001)
• Jerome H. Reichman, The Globalization of Private Knowledge Goods and the Privitization of Global Public Goods, 7(2) Journal of International Economic Law 279 (2004)
• Jerome H. Reichman, The TRIPS Agreement Comes of Age: Conflict or Cooperation with the Developing Countries, 32 Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 441 (2000)
• Jerome H. Reichman, Compliance with the TRIPS Agreement: Introduction to a Scholarly Debate, 29 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 363 (1996)
• Jerome H. Reichman, Privately Legislated Intellectual Property Rights: Reconciling Freedom of Contract with Public Good Uses of Information, 147 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 875 (1998)
• Sue Ann Mota, TRIPS-Five Years of Disputes at the WTO, 17 Arizona J. Int’l & Comp. L. 533. (2000)
• Ron J.T. Corbett, Impact of NAFTA and TRIPS on Intellectual Property Rights Protections in Canada and the United States, 6 NAFTA: Law and Business Review of the Americas 591. (2000)
• Peter M. Gerhart, Reflections: Beyond Compliance Theory -- TRIPS as a Substantive Issue, 32 Case Western Reserve J. Int’l L. 357. (2000)
• John O’Connor, Taking TRIPS to the Eleventh Amendment: The Aftermath of the College Savings Cases, 51 Hastings L.J. 1003. (2000)
• Charles S. Levy, Implementing TRIPS - A Test Of Political Will, 31 Law and Policy in International Business 789. (2000)
• Tuan N. Samahon, TRIPS Copyright Dispute Settlement after the Transition and Moratorium: Nonviolation and Situation Complaints against Developing Countries, 31 Law and Policy in International Business 1051. (2000)
• Vincent Chiappetta, The Desirability of Agreeing to Disagree: The WTO, TRIPS, International IPR Exhaustion and a few other Things, 21 Michigan J. Int’l L. 333. (2000)
• Inti Linkletter Knapp, The Software Piracy Battle in Latin America: Should the United STates Pursue its Aggressive Bilateral Trade Policy despite the Multilateral TRIPS Enforcement Framework?, 21 University of Pennsylvania J. Int’l Econ. L. 173. (2000)
• Andrea Morgan, TRIPS to Thailand: The Act for the Establishment of and Procedure for Intellectual Property and International Trade Court, 23 Fordham Int’l L.J. 795. (2000)
• Frederick M. ABbott, TRIPS in Seattle: The Not-So-Surprising Failure and the Future of the TRIPS Agenda, 18 Berkeley J. Int’l L. 165. (2000)
• Shanker A. Singham, Competition Policy and the Stimulation of Innovation: TRIPS and the Interface between Competition and Patent Protection in the Pharmaceutical Industry, 26 Brooklyn J. Int’l L. 363. (2000)
• Jayashree Watal, The TRIPS Agreement and Developing Countries -- Strong, Weak or Balanced Protection?, 1:2 J. of World Int. Prop. 281. (1998)
• Carlos M. Correa, Implementing the TRIPS Agreement in the Patents Field -- Options for Developing Countries, 1:1 J. of World Int. Prop. 75. (1998)
• John W.C. Chong, Malaysian Intellectual Property Laws and Their Compliance with the TRIPS Agreement, 1:6 J. of World Int. Prop. 1003. (1998)
• Steve Charnovitz, Patent Harmonization under World Trade Rules, 1:1 J. of World Int. Prop. 127. (1998)
• Matthijs Geuze, Patent Rights in the Pharmaceutical Area and their Enforcement -- Experience in the WTO Framework with the Implementation of the TRIPS Agreement, 1:4 J. of World Int. Prop. 585. (1998)
• Richard Gerster, Patents and Development -- A Non-Governmental Organization View Prior to Revision of the Trips Agreement, 1:4 J. of World Int. Prop. 605. (1998)
• Surinder Kaur Verma, Protection of Trade Secrets under the TRIPS Agreement and Developing Countries, 1:5 J. of World Int. Prop. 723. (1998)
• Alexia Perez, The Implementation of the GATT/WTO TRIPS Agreement in Venezuela -- An Overview in 1998, 1:5 J. of World Int. Prop. 747-762 (1998)
• Alexander J. Stack, Patent Exhaustion and Parallel Imports, 1:4 J. of World Int. Prop. 657. (1998)
• Peter Knight, Australia’s Response to the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, 2:2 J. of World Int. Prop. 221. (1999)
• Essam Al Tamimi, Current U.A.E. Copyright Law and How it Compares and Contrasts with WTO’s TRIPS Agreement and the Berne Convention, 2:3 J. of World Int. Prop. 371. (1999)
• Tshimanga Kongolo, Does the Congo’s Copyright and Neighboring Rights Law Conflict with the TRIPS Agreement?, 2:2 J. of Int. Prop. 311. (1999)
• Paul Vandoren, The Implementation of the TRIPS Agreement, 2:1 J. of World Int. Prop. 25. (1999)
• Gary W. Smith, Intellectual Property Rights, Developing Countries, and TRIPS -- An Overview of Issues for Consideration during the Millennium Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations, 2:6 J. of World Int. Prop. 969. (1999)
• Carlos M. Correa, Review of the TRIPS Agreement -- Fostering the Transfer of Technology to Developing Countries (1999), 2:6 J. of World Int. Prop. 939. (1999)
• Kriton Metaxopoulos, Greece: Audiovisual Piracy -- Compliance with TRIPS Agreement, 7:4 Ent. L.R. 77-80. (1996)
• Philippe Cullet, Revision of the TRIPS Agreement concerning the Protection of Plant Varieties -- Lessons from India concerning the Development of a Sui Generis System, 2:4 J. of World Int. Prop. 617. (1999)
• Robert S. Tancer, The Pharmaceutical Industry in India -- Adapting TRIPS, 2:2 J. of World Int. Prop. 171. (1999)
• Alberto F. Riveiro de Almeida, The TRIPS Agreement, The Bilateral Agreements Concerning Geographical Indications and the Philosophy of the WTO, 27(4) E.I.P.R. 150-153. (2005)
• Daniel J. Gervais, Intellectual Property, Trade & Development: The State of Play, 74 Fordham L. Rev. 505. (2005)
• N.S. Gopalakrishnan, TRIPS and Protection of Traditional Knowledge of Genetic Resources: New Challenges to the Patents System, 27(1) E.I.P.R. 11-18. (2005)
• Caterina Tuosto, The TRIPS Council Decision of August 30, 2003 on the Import of Pharmaceuticals under Compulosry Licences, 26(12) E.I.P.R. 542-547. (2004)
• Daniel J. Gervais, The Compatibility of the Skill and Labour Originality Standard with the Berne Convention and the TRIPS Agreement, 26(2) E.I.P.R. 75. (2004)
• Christopher Arup, TRIPS: Across the Global Field of Intellectual Property, 26(1) E.I.P.R. 7-16. (2004)
• Richard Owens, TRIPS and the Fairness in Music Arbitration: The Repercussions, 25(2) E.I.P.R. 49-54. (2003)
• Charles Gielen, Netherlands: Procedural Matters - Preliminary Ruling of ECJ Re Duration of Provisional Injunctive Measures in TRIPS Member States, 24(1) E.I.P.R. N5 (case comment). (2002)
• Pamela Samuelson, Intellectual Property and Economic Development: Opportunities for China in the Information Age, 98 International Symposium on the Protection of Intellectual Property for the 21st Century, October 28-30, 1998, in Beijing, PRC (1998)
• Charles S. Laubach, United Arabe Emirates: Intellectual Property - U.S. Section 301 Watch List for Countries Failing to Implement TRIPS, 21(9) E.I.P.R. N155-156. (1999)
• Laurence R. Helfer, A European Human Rights Analogy for Adjudicating Copyright Claims under TRIPS, 21(1) E.I.P.R. 8-16. (1999)
• Graeme Dinwoodie, The Architecture of the International Intellectual Property System, 77 CHI-KENT L. REV. 993 (2002)
• Anupam Chander, The Romance of the Public Domain, 92 Cal. L. Rev. 1331 (2004)
• Brigitte Binkert, Why the Current Global Intellectual Property Framework Under TRIPS Is Not Working,, 10 Intell. Prop. L. Bull. 143 (2006)
• Anne Elise Herold Li, Is The Federal Circuit Affecting U.S. Treaties? The ITC, § 271(G), GATT/TRIPS & the Kinik Decision,, 16 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 601 (2006)
• Olufunmilayo B. Arewa, TRIPS and Traditional Knowledge: Local Communities, Local Knowledge, and Global Intellectual Property Frameworks,, 10 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 155 (2006)
• Irene Calboli, Expanding the Protection of Geographical Indications of Origin Under TRIPS: , 10 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 181 (2006)
• Sean Pager, TRIPS: A Link Too Far? A Proposal for Procedural Restraints on Regulatory Linkage in the WTO,, 10 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 215 (2006)
• Marco Ricolfi, Is There an Antitrust Antidote Against IP Overprotection Within TRIPS?,, 10 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 305 (2006)
• Peter K. Yu, TRIPS and its Discontents, 10 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 369 (2006)
• Peter K. Yu, Still Dissatisfied After All These Years: Intellectual Property, Post-WTO China, and the Avoidable Cycle of Futility,, 34 Ga. J. Int’l & Comp. L. 143 (2005)
• Peter K. Yu,, Currents and Crosscurrents in the International Intellectual Property Regime,, 38 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 323 (2004)
• Peter K. Yu,, The Harmonization Game: What Basketball Can Teach About Intellectual Property and International Trade,, 26 Fordham Int’l L.J. 218 (2003)
• David Vaver, Popping Patented Pills: Europe and a Decade’s Dose of TRIPS,, 28(5) Eur.Int.Prop.Rev. 282-291 (2006)
• Kevin Kennedy, The 2005 TRIPS Extension For The Least-Developed Countries: A Failure Of The Single Undertaking Approach?, 40 Int’l Law. 683 (2006)
• Tara E. Castillo, Conflicting Beats: Proposing the Adoption of an Additional Obligation Within the WTO TRIPS Agreement Under Article 14 to Recognize Digital Sampling and Digital Sampling Infringement, 7 Tex. Rev. Ent. & Sports L. 31 (2006)
• Donald P. Harris, Carrying a Good Joke Too Far: TRIPS and Treaties of Adhesion, 27 U. Pa. J. Int’l Econ. L. 681 (2006)
• James Thuo Gathii, How Necessity May Preclude State Responsibility for Compulsory Licensing Under the TRIPS Agreement, 31 N.C. J. Int’l L. & Com. Reg. 943 North Carolina Journal Of International Law And Commercial Regulation (2006)
• Aaron C. Lang, On the Need to Expand Article 23 of the TRIPS Agreement, 16 Duke J. Comp. & Int’l L. 487 (2006)
• Brigitte Binkert, Why the Current Global Intellectual Property Framework Under TRIPS Is Not Working, 10 Intell. Prop. L. Bull. 143 (2006)
• Robert Slate, Judicial Copyright Enforcement in China: Shaping World Opinion on TRIPS Compliance, 31 N.C. J. Int’l L. & Com. Reg. 665 (2006)
• Allan Segal, TRIPS: With A Painful Birth, Uncertain Health, and a Host of Issues in China, Where Lies Its Future?, 7 San Diego Int’l L.J. 523 (2006)
• Daniel J. Gervais, The Role of International Treaties in the Interpretation of Canadian Intellectual Property Statutes, in O. Fitzgerald (ed), The Globalized Rule of Law: Relationships Between International and Domestic Law, (Irwin Law) 549-572 (2006)
• Daniel J Gervais, Border Measures in TRIPS, in O. Vrins et al (ed.) The Fight Against Counterfeiting and Piracy at the Borders of the European Communities (Oxford Univ. Press ), 37-62; (2006,)
• Hans Henrik Lidgard, Embracing Price Discrimination: TRIPS and the Suppression of Parallel Trade in Pharmaceuticals, 27 U. Pa. J. Int’l Econ. L. 1043 (2006)
• Petko D. Kantchevski, The Differences between the Panel Procedures of the GATT and the WTO: The Role of GATT and WTO Panels in Trade Dispute Settlement, 3 B.Y.U. Int’l L. & Mgmt. Rev. 7 (2006)
• Thomas Cottier, From Progressive Liberalization to Progressive Regulation in WTO Law, 9 J. Int’l Econ. L. 779 (2006)
• Hunter Nottage, Giving Legal Effect to the Results of WTO Trade Negotiations: An Analysis of the Methods of Changing WTO Law, 9 J. Int’l Econ. L. 989 (2006)
• Timothy Stostad, Trappings of Legality: Judicialization of Dispute Settlement in the WTO, and its Impact on Developing Countries, 39 Cornell Int’l L.J. 811 (2006)
• Robert D. Anderson, Human Rights, Development, and the WTO: The Cases of Intellectual Property and Competition Policy, 9 J. Int’l Econ. L. 707 (2006)
• James Thuo Gathii, The High Stakes of WTO Reform, 104 Mich. L. Rev. (2006)
• Dongsheng Zang, Textualism in GATT/WTO Jurisprudence: Lessons for the Constitutionalization Debate, 33 Syracuse J. Int’l. L. & Com. 393 (2006)
• Chang-fa Lo, S&D Treatment to S&D Agreement under the WTO: Developing Friendlier Global Governance of Trade for Developing Countries, 1 Asian J. WTO & Int’l Health L. & Pol’y 33 (2006)
• David P. Fidler, Calibrating the Wealth and Health of Nations: Trade, Health, and Foreign Policy after the WTO’s First Decade, 1 Asian J. WTO & Int’l Health L. & Pol’y 53 (2006)
• William J. Davey, The WTO: Looking Forwards, 9 J. Int’l Econ. L. 3 (2006)
• Holger Spamann, The Myth of ‘Rebalancing’ Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement Practice, 9 J. Int’l Econ. L. 31 (2006)
• Kara Leitner, WTO Dispute Settlement from 1995 to 2005: Statistical Analysis, 9 J. Int’l Econ. L. 219 (2006)
• Susy Frankel, WTO Application of ‘the Customary Rules of Interpretation of Public International Law’ to Intellectual Property, 46 Va. J. Int’l L. 365 (2006)
• Nari Lee, Toward a Pluralistic Theory on an Efficacious Patent Institution, 6 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 220 (2007)
• Joseph Straus, The Impact of the New World Order on Economic Development: The Role of, 6 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 1 (2006)
• Joe Santamauro, Reducing the Rhetoric: Reconsidering the Relationship of the TRIPS Agreement,, E.I.P.R. 2007, 29(3), 91-99 (2007)
• Assafa Endeshaw, Free Trade Agreements as Surrogates for TRIPS-Plus, E.I.P.R. 2006, 28(7), 374-380 (2006)
• Frederick M. Abbott, The Future of Compulsory Licensing: Deciphering the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, 17 Am. U. Int’l L. Rev. 1299 (2002)
• Jakkrit Kuanpoth, TRIPS-Plus Intellectual Property Rules: Impact on Thailand’s Public Health, 9:5 J. or World Int. Prop. 573-591 (2006)
• Tobias Bender, How to Cope with China’s (Alleged) Failure to Implement the TRIPS Obligations on Enforcement, 9:2 J. of World Int. Prop. 230-250 (2006)
• Duncan Matthews, Bilateral Technical Assistance and TRIPS: The United States, Japan and the European Communities in Comparative Perspective, 9:6 J. of World Int. Prop. 629-653 (2006)
• Kasturi Das, International Protection of India’s Geographical Indications with Special Reference to "Darjeeling" Tea, 9:5 J. of World Int. Prop. 459-495 (2006)
• Harsh V. Chandola, Basmati Rice: Geographical Indication or Mis-Indication, 9:2 J. of World Int. Prop. 166-188 (2006)
• Rosa Castro Bernieri, Intellectual Property Rights in Bilateral Investment Treaties and Access to Medicines: The Case of Latin America, 9:5 J. of World Int. Prop. 548-572 (2006)
• Hans Morten Haugen, Patent Rights and Human Rights: Exploring their Relationships, 10 J. of World Int. Prop. (2007)
• Jakob Cornides, European Union Adopts Regulation on Compulsory Licensing of Pharmaceutical Products for Export, 10:1 J. of World Int. Prop. 70-77 (2007)
• Tshimanga Kongolo, Trips, the Doha Declaration and Public Health, 6:2 J. of World Int. Prop. 373-378 (2003)
• Gail Evans, Trips and the Sufficiency of the Free Trade Principles, 2:5 J. of World Int. Prop. 707-725 (1999)
• Thomas Cottier, Trips, the Doha Declaration and Public Health, 6:2 J. of World Int. Prop. 385-388 (2003)
• Eric Noehrenberg, Trips, the Doha Declaration and Public Health, 6:2 J. of World Int. Prop. 379-383 (2003)
• Robert S. Tancer, TRIPS in the Millennium Round, 2:6 J. of World Int. Prop. 889-910 (1999)
• Ida Madieha bt. Abdul Ghani Azmi, Trips Compliance in Malaysia. The Legislative Response, 6:5 J. of World Int. Prop. 745-761 (2003)
• Richard P. Rozek, The Trips Agreement and Access to Health Care, 2:5 J. of World Int. Prop. 813-819 (1999)
• Mohammed El-Said, The Road from Trips-Minus, to Trips, to Trips-Plus. Implications of Iprs for the Arab World, 8:1 J. of World Int. Prop. 53-65 (2005)
• Carlos M. Correa, The WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism: TRIPS Rulings and Developing Countries, 4:2 J. of World Int. Prop. 251–255 (2001)
• Katja Weckström, When Two Giants Collide: Article 17 and the Scope of Trademark Protection Afforded Under the TRIPS Agreement, 29 Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review 167 (2007)
• Graeme Dinwoodie, Diversifying Without Discriminating: Complying With the Mandates of the TRIPS Agreement, 13 Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review445 (2007)
• Kate Colpitts Hunter, Here There Be Pirates: How China Is Meeting Its IP Enforcement Obligations under TRIPS, 8 San Diego International Law Journal 523 (2007)
• Aditi Diya Nag, The Bird Flu and the Invoking of TRIPS Article 31 “National Emergency” Exception, 34 Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce689 (2007)
• Peter Straub, Farmers in the IP Wrench -- How Patents on Gene-Modified Crops Violate the Right to Food in Developing Countries, 29 Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 187 (2006)
• Jerome Reichman, The Doha Round’s Public Health Legacy: Strategies for the Production and Diffusion of Patented Medicines Under the Amended TRIPS Provisions, Journal of International Economic Law (2007)
• Denis Borges Barbosa, Slouching Towards Development in International Intellectual Property, Minchigan State Law Review (2008)
• Amin Alavi, Special and Differential Treatments Provisions in the TRIPs Negotiations, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2008 3(1):55-58; (2008)
• South Centre , Who Should Bear the TRIPS Enforcement Cost?, South Centre Policy Brief (Jan 2008)
• Revadee Yampoin, Can Trade Measures Induce Complicance with TRIPS?, 3 Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy 165. (1998)
• Carlos M. Correa, The TRIPS Agreement: How Much Room for Maneuver?, 2 Journal of Human Development 79 (2001)
• Felix Rozanski, Developing Countries and Intellectual Property Rights: Myth and Reality, Stockholm Network (2007)
• Peter K. Yu, Intellectual Property, Foreign Direct Investment and the China Exception, In The Global Challenge of Intellectual Property Rights (Subhash C. Jain & Robert C. Bird eds., Edward Elgar Publishing, forthcoming 2008) (2008)
• Peter K. Yu, Complex Guoqing and Intellectual Property Reforms in China, in Intellectual Property and Sustainable Development: Selected Issues (ICTSD, forthcoming 2008) (2008)
• Peter K. Yu, Challenges to the Development of a Human Rights Framework for Intellectual Property, in Intellectual Property and Human Rights (Paul L.C. Torremans ed., 2d ed., Kluwer Law International, forthcoming 2008) (2008)
• Peter K. Yu, Five Disharmonizing Trends in the International Intellectual Property Regime, in 4 Intellectual Property and Information Wealth: Issues and Practices in the Digital Age 73 (Peter K. Yu ed., Praeger Publishers 2007) (2007)
• Peter K. Yu, Digital Piracy and the Copyright Response, in Internet and Governance in Asia—A Critical Reader 340 (Indrajit Banerjee ed., AMIC 2007) (2007)
• Peter K. Yu, Reconceptualizing Intellectual Property Interests in a Human Rights Framework, 40 U.C. Davis Law Review, 1039-1149 (2007)
• Peter K. Yu, Digital Copyright Reform in Hong Kong: Promoting Creativity Without Sacrificing Free Speech, (position paper commissioned by the Journalism and Media Studies Centre, University of Hong Kong) (2007)
• Peter K. Yu, The International Enclosure Movement, Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 82. pp. 827-907 (2007)
• Peter K. Yu, Intellectual Property, Economic Development, and the China Puzzle, in Intellectual Property, Trade and Development: Strategies to Optimize Economic Development in a TRIPS Plus Era 173 (Daniel J. Gervais ed., Oxford University Press 2007) (2007)
• Peter K. Yu, International Enclosure, the Regime Complex, and Intellectual Property Schizophrenia, Michigan State Law Review, 1-33 (2007)
• Peter K. Yu, Ten Common Questions About Intellectual Property and Human Rights, 23 Georgia State University Law Review (2007)
• Peter K. Yu, The Political Economy of Data Protection, 83 Chicago-Kent Law Review (2008)
• Peter K. Yu, Access to Medicines, BRIC Alliances, and Collective Action, 34 American Journal of Law and Medicine (2008)
• Peter K. Yu, The Sweet and Sour Story of Chinese Intellectual Property Rights, in Technology, Progress and Prosperity: A History of Intellectual Property and Development (Graham Dutfield and Uma Suthersanen eds., Palgrave Macmillan, forthcoming 2008) (2008)
• Peter K. Yu, Competition Law and Copyright Misuse, in Un Cocktail de Droit d’Auteur (Ysolde Gendreau ed., Les Éditions Thémis, 2007) (2007)
• Ermias Tekeste Biadgleng, The changing structure and governance of intellectual property enforcement, South Centre Research Paper No. 15 (2008)
• Peter K. Yu, From pirates to partners: protecting intellectual property in China in the twenty-first century, 50 American University Law (2000)
• Peter K. Yu, New media at the turn of the century, 8 Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology (2007)
• Peter K. Yu, Anticircumvention and Anti-Anticircumvention, 84 Denver University Law Review 13-77 (2006)
• Ariel Katz, A network effects perspective on software piracy, U Toronto Law and Economics Research Paper No. 03-01 (2003)
• Ariel Katz, Making Sense of Nonsense: Intellectual Property, Antitrust, and Market Power, Arizona Law Review, Vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 837-909 (2007)
• Ariel Katz, The Potential Demise of another Natural Monopoly: New Technologies and the Future of Collective Administration of Copyrights, U Toronto Law and Economics Research Paper No. 04-02 (2004)
• Ariel Katz, Pharmaceutical Lemons: Innovation and Regulation in the Drug Industry, Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 1-41 (2007)
• Ariel Katz, An Evaluation of the Collective Copyright Management in Canada - A Comment, U Toronto, Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1001954 (2007)
• Ariel Katz, The Potential Demise of Another Natural Monopoly: Rethinking the Collective Administration of Performing Rights, Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 541-593 (2005)
• Graeme W. Austin, Essay: Copyright Law Reform Through a Human Rights Lens, Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 07-34 (2008)
• Graeme W. Austin, International Copyright Law & Domestic Constitutional Doctrines, Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts (2007)
• Graeme W. Austin, Essay - Tolerating Confusion About Confusion: Trademark Policies and Fair Use, Arizona Law Review, Vol. 50 (2007)
• Graeme W. Austin, The Berne Convention as a Canon of Construction: Moral Rights After Dastar, NYU Annual Survey of American Law (2005)
• Ariel Katz, The Potential Demise of Another Natural Monopoly: New Technologies and the Administration of Performing Rights, Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 245-284 (2006)
• Kendra Robins, Extraterritorial patent enforcement and multinational patent litigation: proposed guidelines for U.S. courts [notes], 93 Virginia Law Review, 1259 (2007)
• Amanda Mitchell, Tamiflu, the Takings Clause, and Compulsory Licenses: An Exploration of Governments Options for Accessing Medical Patents [comments], 95 California Law Review 535 (2007)
• William W. III Fisher, When should we permit differential pricing of information [comments], 55 UCLA Law Review 1 (2007)
• Thomas F. Cotter, A Burkean perspective on patent eligibility, 22 Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 855 (2007)
• Thomas Cottier, The TRIPs Agreement Without a Competition Agreement, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei Working Paper No. 65-99 (2000)
• Thomas Cottier, The Doha Waiver and its Effects on the Nature of the TRIPS System and on Competition Law: The Impact of Human Rights, NCCR Trade Regulation Working Paper No. 2006/21 (2006)
• Thomas Cottier, The Protection of Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge: Towards More Specific Rights and Obligations in World Trade Law, Journal of International Economic Law, Vol. 1, Issue 4, pp. 555-584 (1998)
• Thomas Cottier, Legal Perspectives on Traditional Knowledge: The Case for Intellectual Property Protection, Journal of International Economic Law, Vol. 7, Issue 2, pp. 371-399 (2004)
• Oliver Ting, Pirates of the Orient: China, Film Piracy, and Hollywood [comments], 14 Villanova Sports & Entertainment Law Journal, 399 (2007)
• Keith E. Maskus, The Globalization Of Private Knowledge Goods And The Privatization Of Global Public Goods, Journal of International Economic Law, Vol. 7, pp. 279-320 (2004)
• Frederick M. Abbott, The Doha Round’s Public Health Legacy: Strategies for the Production and Diffusion of Patented Medicines Under the Amended TRIPS Provisions, 10 Journal of International Economic Law 921 (2007)
• Jerome H. Reichman, Harmonization without Consensus: Critical Reflections on Drafting a Substantive Patent Law Treaty, 57 Duke Law Journal (2007)
• Arti K. Rai, Pathways Across the Valley of Death: Novel Intellectual Property Strategies for Accelerated Drug Discovery, 8 Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law and Ethics (2008)
• Jerome H. Reichman, Securing Compliance with the TRIPS Agreement after US v India, 1(4) Journal of International Economic Law 585 (1998)
• Jerome H. Reichman, Privately-Legislated Intellectual Property Rights: Reconciling Freedom of Contract with Public Good Uses of Information, 147 University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 875-970 (1999)
• Brian A. Benko, Russia and Allofmp3.com: Why the WTO and WIPO Must Create a New System for Resolving Copyright Disputes in the Digital Age [notes], 1 Akron Intellectual Property Journal (2007)
• R. Anthoney Reese, Public but Private: Copyrights New Unpublished Public Domain, 85 Texas Law Review, 585 (2007)
• Mark A. Lemley, Reducing digital copyright infringement without restricting innovation, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 56, p. 1345 (2004)
• R. Anthoney Reese, Copyright and Internet Music Transmissions: Existing Law, Major Controversies, Possible Solutions, U of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 26 (2001)
• R. Anthoney Reese, The First Sale Doctrine in the Era of Digital Network, U of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 57; and U of Texas Law, Law and Econ Research Paper No. 004 (2003)
• Mark A. Lemley, A Quick and Inexpensive System for Resolving Digital Copyright Disputes, Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 23, No. 1 (2005)
• R. Anthony Reese, The Public Display Right: The Copyright Act’s Neglected Solution to the Controversy Over ’RAM Copies’, University of Illinois Law Review (2001)
• R. Anthony Reese, Will Merging Access Controls and Rights Controls Undermine the Structure of Anticircumvention Law?, U of Texas Law, Law and Econ Research Paper No. 021; and U of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 61 (2004)
• R. Anthony Reese, The Temporal Dynamics of ’Capable of Substantial Noninfringing Uses’, Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, Vol. 13, No. 1 (2006)
• Mitchell N. Berman, State Accountability for Violations of Intellectual Property Rights: How To ’Fix’ Florida Prepaid (And How Not To), case and teaching paper series (2004)
• Jessica Litman, Lawful Personal Use, 85 Texas Law Review, 1871 (2007)
• Jessica Litman, The Economics of Open-Access Law Publishing, Lewis & Clark Law Review, Vol. 10, p. 779 (2006)
• Jessica Litman, Information Privacy/Information Property, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 52, No. 5 (2000)
• Jessica Litman, Electronic Commerce and Free Speech, Journal of Ethics and Information Technology, Vol. 1, P. 213 (1999)
• Jessica Litman, Sharing and Stealing, Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 27, 2004 (2004)
• Kal Raustiala, The Piracy and Paradox: Innovation and Intellectual Property in Fashion Design, 92 Virginia Law Review 1687 (2006)
• Chris Sprigman, Indirect Enforcement of the Intellectual Property Clause, 30 Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts, Nos. 3/4 (2007)
• Kal Raustiala, Where IP Isn’t, Virginia Law Review, In Brief, January 22, 2007 (2007)
• Chris Sprigman, The 99-Cent Question, Journal on Telecommunications and High Technology Law ()
• Chris Sprigman, Reform(Aliz)Ing Copyright, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 57, p. 485 (2004)
• Kal Raustiala, The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources, International Organization, Spring 2004 (2004)
• Kal Raustiala, Density & Conflict in International Intellectual Property Law, University of California at Davis Law Review ()
• Kal Raustiala, The Global Struggle Over Geographic indications, UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 06-32 (2006)
• Randal C. Picker, Of Pirates and Puffy Shirts: A Comment on the Piracy Paradox: Innovation and Intellectual Property in Fashion Design, Virginia Law Review ()
• Assafa Endeshaw, The Paradox of Intellectual Property Lawmaking in the New Millennium: Universal Templates as Terms of Surrender for Non-Industrial Nations; Piracy as an Offshoot, Nanyang Technological University Business School Business Law Working Paper (2001)
• Assafa Endeshaw, Reconfiguring intellectual property for the information age: towards information property?, Nanyang Business School, Business Law Division Working Paper No. 4/2003 (2003)
• Assafa Endeshaw, Intellectual property enforcement in Asia: a reality check, International Journal of Law and Information Technology, Vol. 13, Issue 3, pp. 378-412 (2005)
• Madhavi Sunder, IP3, 59 Stanford Law Review 257 (2006)
• Madhavi Sunder, Cultural Dissent, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 54 (2001)
• Anupam Chander, Everyone’s a Superhero: A Cultural Theory of ’Mary Sue’ Fan Fiction as Fair Use, California Law Review, Vol. 95, p. 597 (2007)
• Anupam Chander, Is Nozick Kicking Rawls’s Ass? Intellectual Property and Social Justice, UC Davis Law Review, Vol. 40 (2007)
• Madhavi Sunder, Property in Personhood, RETHINKING COMMODIFICATION: CASES AND READINGS IN LAW & CULTURE, Martha M. Ertman and Joan C. Williams, eds., 2005 (2005)
• Madhavi Sunder, The Invention of Traditional Knowledge, UC Davis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 75 (2006)
• Margaret Jane Radin, The Subject and Object of Commodification, RETHINKING COMMODIFICATION: CASES AND READINGS IN LAW & CULTURE, Martha M. Ertman and Joan C. Williams, eds., New York University Press, 2005 (2005)
• Anupam Chander, The Romance of the Public Domain, California Law Review, Vol. 92 (2004)
• Mark F. Schultz, Fear and Norms and Rock & Roll: What Jambands Can Teach Us about Persuading People to Obey Copyright Law, 21 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 651 (2006)
• Mark F. Schultz, Copynorms: Copyright and Social Norms, (2006)
• Anupam Chander, Exporting DMCA Lockouts, Cleveland State Law Review, Vol. 54 (2006)
• Eric Priest, The future of music and film piracy in China, 21 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 795 (2006)
• Margaret Jane Radin, Regime Change in Intellectual Property: Superseding the Law of the State with the ’Law’ of the Firm, University of Ottawa Law & Technology Journal, Vol. 1, p. 173 (2003)
• Guido Westkamp, The Recognition and Status of Traditional Knowledge in the Conflict of Laws, 88 Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society 699 (2006)
• Heba A. Raslan, Sharia and the Protection of Intellectual Property - The Example of Egypt, 47 The Intellectual Property Law Review 497 (2006)
• Candace S. Friel, High Cost of Global Intellectual Property Theft: An Analysis of Current Trends, the TRIPS Agreement, and Future Approaches to Combat the Problem, 7 Wake Forest Intellectual Property Law Journal 209 (2006)
• Haris Apostolopoulus, Anti-Competitive Abuse of IP Rights and Compulsory Licensing through the International Dimension of the Trips Agreement and the Stockholm Proposal for Its Amendment, 6 Richmond Journal of Global Law and Business 265 (2006)
• Tara E. Castillo, Conflicting Beats: Proposing the Adoption of an Additonal Obligation within the WTO TRIPS Agreement under Article 14 to Recognize Digital Sampling and Digital Sampling Infringement [notes], 7 Texas Review of Entertainment & Sports Law 31 (2006)
• Edson Beas Jr. Rodrigues, Brazil’s Prior Consent Law: A Dialogue between Brazil and the United States over Where the TRIPS Agreement Currently Sets the Balance between the Protection of Pharmaceutical Patents and Access to Med, 16 Albany Law Journal of Science & Technology 423 (2006)
• Asanka Perera, TRIPS Agreement and Protection of Plant Varieties: A More Intense Scrutiny, 18 Sri Lanka Journal of International Law 223 (2006)
• Aaron C. Lang, On the Need to Expand Article 23 of the TRIPS Agreement [notes], 16 Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 487 (2006)
• Vishal Gupta, A Mathematical Approach to Benefit-Detriment Analysis as a Solution to Compulsory Licensing of Pharmaceuticals under the TRIPS Agreement, 13 Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law 631 (2005)
• James Thuo Gathii, How Necessity May Preclude State Responsibility for Compulsory Licensing under the TRIPS Agreement, 31 North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation (2005)
• James Thuo Gathii, The Legal Status of the Doha Declaration on Trips and Public Health Under the Vienna Convention of the Law of Treaties, 15(2) Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 291 (2002)
• James Thuo Gathii, Rights, Patents, Markets and the Global Aids Pandemic, 14 Florida Journal of International Law 261 (2002)
• James Thuo Gathii, Balancing Patent Rights and Affordability of Prescription Drugs in Addressing Bio-Terrorism: An Analysis of In re Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride Antitrust Litigation, 13(3) Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology 651 (2003)
• Melissa McClellan, Tools for Success: The TRIPS Agreement and the Human Right to Essential Medicines, 12 Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice 153 (2005)
• Tunisia L. Staten, Geographical Indications Protection under the TRIPS Agreement: Uniformity Not Extension, Geographical Indications Protection under the TRIPS Agreement: Uniformity Not Extension (2005)
• Markus Nolff, Paragraph 6 of the Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health and the Decision of the WTO regarding Its Implementation: An Expeditious Solution, 86 Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society 291 (2004)
• Graeme B. Dinwoodie, WTO Dispute Resolution and the Preservation of the Public Domain of Science under International Law, INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC, GOODS AND TRANSFER OF TECHNOLOGY UNDER A GLOBALIZED INTELLIECTUAL PROPERTY REGIME, Maskus and Reichman, eds., Cambridge Univiverstiy, 2005 (2005)
• Jerome H. Reichman, A Reverse Notice and Takedown Regime to Enable Public Interest Uses of Technically Protected Copyrighted Works, Berkeley Technology Law Journal ()
• Aaron Xavier Fellmeth, Secrecy, Monopoly, and Access to Pharmaceuticals in International Trade Law: Protection of Marketing Approval Data under the TRIPs Agreement, 45 Harvard International Law Journal 443 (2004)
• Donald P. Harris, TRIPS’ Rebound: An Historical Analysis of How the TRIPS Agreement Can Ricochet back against the United States, 25 Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business 99 (2004)
• Donald P. Harris, Carrying a Good Joke Too Far: Treaty of Adhesion, 27 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law (2006)
• Graeme B. Dinwoodie, The International Intellectual Property Law System: New Actors, New Institutions, New Sources, Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review (2006)
• Graeme B. Dinwoodie, Patenting Science: Protecting the Domain of Accessible Knowledge, THE FUTURE OF THE PUBLIC DOMAIN IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, Guibault and Hugenholtz, eds., Kluwer Law International (2006)
• Graeme B. Dinwoodie, Private Ordering and the Creation of International Copyright Norms: The role of Public Structuring, 1 Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 160 (2004)
• Graeme B. Dinwoodie, Private Ordering and the Creation of International Copyright Norms: The role of Public Structuring, 1 Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 160 (2004)
• Graeme B. Dinwoodie, Copyright Lawmaking Authority: An (Inter)Nationalist Perspective on the Treaty Clause, 30 Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts (2007)
• Graeme B. Dinwoodie, International Intellectual Property Law and the Public Domain of Science, 7(2) Journal of International Economic Law 431 (2004)
• Rochelle Cooper Dreyfuss, Unique Works/Unique Challenges at the Intellectual Property/Competition Law Interface, EUROPEAN COMPETITION LAW ANNUAL 2005 - THE INTERCATION BETWEEN COMPETITION LAW AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, Claus-Dieter Ehlermann and Isabela Atanasiu, eds., Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland, O (2005)
• Rochelle Cooper Dreyfuss, Patents and Human Rights: Where is the Paradox?, Molengrafica Series (2007)
• Rochelle Cooper Dreyfuss, Draft Convention on Jurisdiction and Recognition of Judgments in Intellectual Property Matters, 77 Chicago-Kent Law Review (2002)
• Jane C. Ginsburg, International Copyright: From a "Bundle" of National Copyright Laws to a Supranational Code?, The Journal of the Copyright Society of the United States, Millenium Volume (2000)
• Jane C. Ginsburg, The Pros and Cons of Strengthening Intellectual Property Protection: Technological Protection Measures and Section 1201 of the US Copyright Act, Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 07-137 (2007)
• Jane C. Ginsburg, Berne Without Borders: Geographic Indiscretion and Digital Communications, Columbia Law School, Pub Law Research Paper No. 01-30 (2001)
• Malla Praveen Bhasa, WTO and Indian Pharmaceutical Industry: A Study, WTO AND COMPETITIVENESS – CHALLENGES FOR INDIAN BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT, D. Panduranga Rao, ed., Excel Books, 2001 (2007)
• M. Gregg Bloche, WTO Deference to National Health Policy: Toward an Interpretive Principle, 5(4) Journal of International Economic Law 825 (2002)
• Henry Grabowski, Patents, Innovation and Access to New Pharmaceuticals, 5(4) Journal of International Economic Law 849 (2002)
• Audrey R. Chapman, The Human Rights Implications of Intellectual Property Protection, 5(4) Journal of International Economic Law 861 (2002)
• Peter J. Hammer, Differential Pricing of Essential AIDS Drugs: Markets, Politics and Public Health, 5(4) Journal of International Economic Law 883 (2002)
• Frederic M. Scherer, Post-TRIPS Options for Access to Patented Medicines in Developing Nations, 5(4) Journal of International Economic Law 913 (2002)
• Frederic M. Scherer, A Note on Global Welfare in Pharmaceutical Patenting, FRB of Philadelphia Working Paper No. 03-11 (2002)
• Gail E. Evans, The Protection of Geographical Indications after Doha: Quo Vadis?, 9 Journal of International Economic Law 575 (2006)
• Won M. Choi, Legal Problems of Making Regional Trade Agreements with Non-WTO-Member States, 8(4) Journal of International Economic Law 825 (2005)
• Andrew Beckerman-Rodau, Patent Law-Balancing Profit Maximization and Public Access to Technology, 4(1) Columbia Science & Technology Law Review (2002)
• Carsten Fink, How stronger patent protection in India might affect the behavior of transnational pharmaceutical industries, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2352 (2000)
• Wilfred J. Ethier, Intellectual property rights and dispute settlement in the World Trade Organization, 7 Journal of International Economic Law 449 (2004)
• Hanns Ullrich, Expansionist intellectual property protection and reductionist competition rules: a TRIPS perspective, 7 Journal of International Economic Law 401 (2004)
• Patricia M. Smith, A long and winding road: trips and the evolution of an international competition framework, 2(3) Journal of International Economic Law 435 (1999)
• Matthijs Geuze, WTO dispute settlement practice relating to the trips agreement, 2 Journal of International Economic Law 347 (1999)
• Adrian Otten, Implementation of the TRIPs Agreement and prospects for its further development, 1(4) Journal of International Economic Law 523 (1998)
• Robert D. Anderson, The interface between competition policy and intellectual property in the context of the international trading system, 1(4) Journal of International Economic Law 655 (1998)
• Nancy T. Gallini, The economics of patents: lessons from recent U.S. Patent Reform, 16(2) Journal of Economic Perspectives 131 (2002)
• Mukesh Eswaran, Patent Policy and the Direction of Technological Change, 27(4) RAND Journal of Economics 722 (1996)
• Josh Lerner, 150 Years of Patent Protection, NBER Working Paper No. 7478 (2000)
• William W. Fisher III, Reconstructing the Fair Use Doctrine, 101(8) Harvard Law Review 1661 (1988)
• Stanley M. Besen, Private Copying, Appropriability, and Optimal Copyright Royalties, 32 Journal of Law and Economics 255 (1989)
• Josh Lerner, Some Simple Economics of Open Source, HBS Finance Working Paper No. 00-059 (2000)
• Peter S. Menell, Intellectual Property, A Mitchell Polinsky & Steven Shavell, Handbook of Law and Economics, (Amsterdam; London: Elsevier, 2007) (2007)
• Jean O. Lanjouw, The Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights: A Survey of the Empirical Literature, NBER Working Paper No. 6296 (1997)
• Suzanne Scotchmer, The Political Economy of Intellectual Property Treaties, NBER Working Paper No. 9114 (2002)
• Shubham Chaudhuri, Estimating the Effects of Global Patent Protection in Pharmaceuticals: A Case Study of Quinolones in India, NBER Working Paper No. 10159 (2003)
• Gene Grossman, International Protection of Intellectual Property, NBER Working Paper No. 8704 (2002)
• Amir Attaran, Do Patents for Antiretroviral Drugs Constrain Access to AIDS Treatment in Africa?, 286(15) Journal of the American Medical Association 1886 (2001)
• Carlos A.P. Braga, The economics of intellectual property rights and the GATT: A view from the south, 22 Vandabilt Journal of Translational Law 264 (1989)
• Kevin Outterson, Should Access to Medicines and Trips Flexibilities Be Limited to Specific Diseases?, 34 American Journal of Law and Medicine (2008)
• Kevin Outterson, Patent Buy-Outs for Global Disease Innovations for Low- and Middle-Income Countries, 32 American Journal of Law and Medicine 159 (2006)
• Baris Karapinar, Benefiting from Biotechnology: Pro-Poor IPRs and Public-Private Partnerships, NCCR Trade Regulation Working Paper No. 2007/35 (2007)
• Michelangelo Temmerman, The Patentability of Plant Genetic Inventions, NCCR Trade Regulation Working Paper No. 2007/04 (2007)
• Peter Drahos, An alternative framework for the global regulation of intellectual property rights, Austrian Journal of Development Studies, No. 1, October 2005 (2005)
• Peter Drahos, When the Weak Bargain with the Strong: Negotiations in the World Trade Organization, 8(1) International Negotiation 79 (2003)
• Peter Drahos, Trust Me: Patent Offices in Developing Countries, Centre for Governance of Knowledge and Development Working Paper (2007)
• Peter Drahos, The Regulation of Public Goods, 7(2) Journal of International Economic Law 321 (2004)
• Gaurav Raizada, Strategic Value-Chain Analysis of Indian Pharmaceutical Alliances, (2006)
• Duncan N. Matthews, Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights: Will the Uruguay Round Consensus Hold?, CSGR Working Paper No. 99/02 (2002)
• Duncan N. Matthews, NGOs, Intellectual Property Rights and Multilateral Institutions, (2006)
• Carlos Primo Braga, How Stronger Protection of Intellectual Property Rights Affects International Trade Flows, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2051 (1999)
• Carlos Primo Braga, Reforming Intellectual Property Rights Regimes: Challenges for Developing Countries, 1(4) Journal of International Economic Law (1998)
• Eugenia Baroncelli, Trademark Protection or Protectionism?, 15(1) Review of International Economics 126 (2007)
• Maurice Schiff, Trade-Related Technology Diffusion and the Dynamics of North-South and South-South Integration, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2861 (2002)
• Olivier Lumenga-Neso, On "Indirect" Trade-Related Research and Development Spillovers, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2580 (2001)
• Alejandro Izquierdo, Information Diffusion in International Markets, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3032 (2003)
• Maurice Schiff, North-South and South-South Trade-Related Technology Diffusion: An Industry Level Analysis, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 3711 (2003)
• Andrew T. Guzman, International antitrust and the WTO: the lesson from intellectual property, UC Berkeley Law & Economics Research Paper No. 2000-20 (2000)
• Meduri Aparna, Product patent protection-India’s Interest, (2005)
• Meduri Aparna, Article 21 of Indian Constitution-Mandate for Life Saving, (2006)
• Peter Drahos, ’Weaving Webs of Influence: The United States, Free Trade Agreements and Dispute Resolution, 41(1) Journal of World Trade 191 (2007)
• Peter Drahos, ’Cities of Planning and Cities of Non-Planning: A Geography of Intellectual Property, World Information City (IP Edition) November, 10 (2005)
• Peter Drahos, Intellectual Property Rights in the Knowledge Economy, in Rooney, David, Hearn, Greg & Ninan, Abraham, Handbook on the Knowlege Economy, (Cheltenham, UK ; Northampton, MA : Edward Elgar, 2005) (2005)
• Peter Drohas, Death of Patents, in Drahos, Peter (ed) Death of Patents, (London: Lawtext Publishing Limited/ Queen Mary Intellectual Property Research Institute, 2005) (2005)
• Peter Drahos, Pharmaceuticals, Intellectual Property and Free Trade: The Case of the US–Australia Free Trade Agreement, Prometheus 22(3): 243–257 (2004)
• Peter Drohas, Intellectual Property and Pharmaceutical Markets: A Nodal Governance Approach, 77(2) Temple Law Review 401 (2004)
• Peter Drohas, ’The free trade agreement between Australia and the United States, British Medical Journal 328 (7451), 29 May 2004: 1271–1272 (2004)
• Peter Drahos, Towards an International Framework for the Protection of Traditional Group Knowledge and Practice, Paper delivered at UNCTAD-Commonwealth Secretariat Workshop on Elements of National Sui Generis Systems for the Preservation, Protection and Promotion of Traditional Knowledge, Innovations and Practic (2004)
• Peter Drahos, Trading in Public Hope, The Annals of the American Academy, 1-21 (2004)
• Peter Drahos, Innovation, Competition, Standards and Intellectual Property: Policy Perspectives from Economics and Law, 16(1) Information Economics and Policy 1 (2004)
• Reiko Aoki, Compulsory licensing of technology and the essential facilities doctrine, 16(1) Information Economics and Policy 13 (2004)
• Alex Sundakov, Intellectual property and price discrimination: Do as you please in the name of innovation?, 16(1) Information Economics and Policy 31 (2004)
• Paul J Heald, A skeptical look at Mansfield’s famous 1994 survey, 16(1) Information Economics and Policy 57 (2004)
• Gary Lea, Standards and intellectual property rights: an economic and legal perspective, 16(1) Information Economics and Policy 67 (2004)
• Linda Y. Yueh, Global Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Growth, 5 Northwestern Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property 436 (2007)
• Lawrence Liang, The Black and White (and Grey) of Copyright, World Information (IP Edition) (2005)
• James Love, Options to Traditional Patents, World Information (IP Edition) (2005)
• Corinna Heineke, Trips into the Uncertain: Intellectual Property Rights, Development and the State, World Information (IP Edition) (2005)
• Joseph Stiglitz, Intellectual-Property Rights and Wrongs, World Information (IP Edition) (2005)
• Jamie King, "Don’t Copy that Floppy!": The Propaganda of Digital Protectionism, World Information (IP Edition) (2005)
• Peter Suber, Open Access to Science in the Developing World, World Information (IP Edition) (2005)
• Chris Armstrong, Schools & the "African Digital Information Commons", World Information (IP Edition) (2005)
• Ronaldo Lemos, Brazil’s Canto Livre Project: The Emergence of Society’s Creativity, World Information (IP Edition) (2005)
• Solomon Benjamin, Analogue to Digital: Re-Living Big Business’s Nightmare in New Hydras, World Information (IP Edition) (2005)
• Laura Nader, Promise or Plunder? A Past and Future Look at Law and Development, 7(2) Global Jurist, Article 1 (2007)
• Craig A. Nard, Constitutionalizing Patents: From Venice to Philadelphia, 2(2) Review of Law & Economics, Article 4 (2006)
• Haoliang Wu, Prior Consents: Preventing Offensive Genetic Engineering Patents Against Indigenous People’s Rights, 5(1) Global Jurist Frontiers, Article 3 (2005)
• John Asland, Protection of Geographical Indications – What is it and What’s in it for Norway? – Thoughts from the Outskirts of Europe, 17(1) Bond Law Review 1 (2005)
• Charles Lawson, Patenting Health-Related Databases and Information in Australia, 17(1) Bond Law Review (2005)
• Marco Ricolfi, Intellectual Property Rights and Legal Order, 2(1) global Jurist Advances, Article 3 (2002)
• Joshua J. Simons, Cooperation and Coercion: The Protection of Intellectual Property in Developing Countries, 11(1) Bond Law Review (1999)
• William van Caenegem, Registered Geographical Indications : Between Intellectual Property and Rural Policy – Part I, 6(5) Journal of World Intellectual Property 699 (2003)
• William van Caenegem, Registered Geographical Indications : Between Intellectual Property and Rural Policy – Part II, 6(6) Journal of World Intellectual Property 861 (2003)
• Pooja Van Dyck, Importing Western Style, Exporting Tragedy: Changes in Indian Patent Law and, 6(1) Northwestern Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property 138 (2007)
• Robert C. Bird, The Emerging BRIC Economies: Lessons from Intellectual Property Negotiation and Enforcement, 5(3) Northwestern Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property 1 (2007)
• David Orozco, Will India and China Profit from Technological Innovation?, 5(3) Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property 27 (2007)
• J. Benjamin Bai, What Multinational Companies Need to Know About Patent Invalidation and Patent Litigation in China, 5(3) Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property (2007)
• Vipin Gupta, Technological Drivers of BRIC Economies: Public Versus Private Sector Control, 5(3) Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property (2007)
• James E. Malackowski, Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property Second Annual Symposium: Keynote Speech, 5(3) Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property 490 (2007)
• Robert B. Ahdieh, The Existing Legal Infrastructure of BRICs: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going?, 5(3) Northwestern Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property 503 (2007)
• J. Benjamin Bai, From Infringement to Innovation: Counterfeiting and Enforcement in the BRICs, 5(3) Northwestern Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property 525 (2007)
• Kevin Iles, A comparative analysis of the impact of experimental use exemptions in patent law on incentives to innovate, 4(1) Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property 61 (2005)
• Haley Stein, Intellectual Property and Genetically Modified Seeds: The United States, Trade, and the Developing World, 3(2) Northwestern Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property 160 (2005)
• Katherine E. White, An Efficient Way to Improve Patent Quality for Plant Varieties, 3(1) Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property 79 (2004)
• Peter Drahos, The Global Intellectual Property Ratchet: Why it Fails as Policy and What Should be Done About It, Paper for the Open Society Institute (2003)
• U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission , The Crisis in Intellectual Property Protection and China’s Role in That Crisis, U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission Research Paper (May 2007)
• United States-China Economic and Security Review Commission , A Review of TRIPS and TRIMS Enforcement Issues in The People’s Republic of China, United States-China Economic and Security Review Commission Research Paper (2007)
• Peter Drahos, Trade and Intellectual Property, Special Issue of Prometheus, vol.16: 245–410 (1998)
• Peter Drahos, ’Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) and the Threat to Patients, 17(3) Medicine and Law 299 (1998)
• Charles Lawson, Patenting genetic materials’ unresolved issues and promoting competition in biotechnology, 16(1) Information Economics and Policy 91 (2004)
• Frances Hanks, Intellectual property and price discrimination: a challenge for Australian competition law, 16(1) Information Economics and Policy 113 (2004)
• Stuart Macdonald, When means become ends: considering the impact of patent strategy on innovation, 16(1) Information Economics and Policy 135 (2004)
• United States-China Economic and Security Review Commission, China’s Laws, Regulations and Practices in the Areas of Technology Transfer, Trade-Related Investment Measures, Subsidies and Intellectual Property Protection Which Raise WTO Compliance Concerns, United States-China Economic and Security Review Commission Research Paper (September)
• Janet Hope, Open Source Biotechnology, Australian National University PhD Thesis, Canberra (2004)
• Clive Hamilton, Barrier to Trade or Barrier to Profit? Why Australia’s Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme Worries U.S. Drug Companies, 4(2) Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics 373 (2004)
• Jason Andrews, How Do International Trade Agreements Influence the Promotion of Public Health - An Introduction to the Issue Case Study: Introduction, 4 Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law and Ethics 339 (2004)
• Susan Scafidi, The "Good Old Days" of TRIPS: The U.S. Trade Agenda and the Extension of Pharmaceutical Test Data Protection, 4 Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law and Ethics 341 (2004)
• Nephil Matangi Maskay, The Interaction of Increased Trade and the Decentralization of Health Care Delivery in Nepal: A Suggestion for Reform, 4 Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law and Ethics 353 (2004)
• Samnang Chea, Cambodia’s Membership in the WTO and the Implications for Public Health, 4 Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law and Ethics 363 (2004)
• Peter Sainsbury, Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement and the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, 4 Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law and Ethics 387 (2004)
• Juan Rovira, Trade Agreements, Intellectual Property, and the Role of the World Bank in Improving Access to Medicines in Developing Countries, 4 Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law and Ethics 401 (2004)
• Peter Currie, How Can Resources Be Mobilized to Confront a Global Health Emergency - An Introduction to the Problem, 4 Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law and Ethics 125 (2004)
• Linda M. Distlerath, African Comprehensive HIV/AIDS Partnerships - A New Role for Multinational Corporations in Global Health Policy, 4 Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law and Ethics 147 (2004)
• Ellen F.M. ’t Hoen, The Responsibility of Research Universities to Promote Access to Essential Medicines, 3(2) Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law and Ethics (2003)
• Lita Nelson, The Role of University Technology Transfer Operations in Assuring Access to Medicines and Vaccines in Developing Countries, 3(2) Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law and Ethics (2003)
• Buddhima Lokuge, Trade Disputes and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme: Constructive ambiguities, non-violation nullification disputes and the Australia US Free Trade Agreement, CGKD Working Paper, September 2004, 1–27 (2004)
• Buddhima Lokuge, A Backdoor to Higher Medicine Prices?: Intellectual Property and the Australia-US Free Trade Agreement, Australia Institute (2003)
• Buddhima Lokuge, Patent monopolies, pandemics and antiviral stockpiles: Things that developing and developed countries can do, CGKD Working Paper, August 2005, 1–15 (2005)
• Dianne Nicol, Cooperative Intellectual Property Strategies in Biotechnology, Australasian IP Law Resources 5 (2006)
• Janet Hope, ’Model-mongering in biotechnology R&D: the limits of the "open source" analogy, Australasian IP Law Resources 42 (2006)
• Bryan Mercurio, Biomedical patents and third world diseases, Australasian IP Law Resources 27 (2006)
• Luigi Palombi, TRIPS, bilateralism and patents: how they are failing both the developed and the developing world and what to do about it, 1(1) Electronic Journal in Communication, Information and Innovation in Health 71 (2007)
• Luigi Palombi, Equity for traditional owners, the developing world and intellectual property, (2007)
• Luigi Palombi, The genetic sequence right: a Sui Generis alternative to the patenting of biological materials, (2005)
• Luigi Palombi, The impact of TRIPS on the validity of the European Biotechnology Directive, 2 Journal of International Biotechnology Law 15 (2005)
• Luigi Palombi, The Patenting of Biological Materials In the Context of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, PhD Thesis, University of New South Wales, Sydney (2004)
• Luigi Palombi, Patentable Subject Matter, TRIPS and the European Biotechnology Directive: Australia and Patenting Human Genes, 26(3) UNSW Law Journal 782 (2003)
• Luigi Palombi, Patenting Human Genetic Information and the Appropriateness of the International Patent System, Centre for Law and Genetics, University of Tasmania, 1-15 (2002)
• Luigi Palombi, Intellectual Property Rights Over Genetic Materials and Genetic and Related Technologies, Submission to the Australian Law Reform Commission Inquiry, September 2003, 196 pages (2003)
• Jerome H. Reichman, The Know-How Gap in the TRIPS Agreement: Why Software Fared Badly, and What Are the Solutions, 17 Hastings Communications & Entertainment Law Journal 763 (1995)
• Jerome H. Reichman, Of Green Tulips and Legal Kudzu: Repackaging Rights in Subpatentable Innovation, 53 Vanderbilt Law Review 1743 (2000)
• Jerome H. Reichman, Contractually Reconstructed Research Commons for Scientific Data in a Highly Protectionist Intellectual Property Environment, 66 Law & Contemporary Problems 315 (2003)
• Arti K. Rai, Proprietary Rights and Collective Action: The Case of Biotechnology Research with Low Commercial Value, in Maskus, Keith E. and Reichman, Jerome H., Eds. International Public Goods and Technology Transfer in a Globalized Intellectual Property Regime, pages pp. 288-306. (2005)
• Jerome H. Reichman, The Duration of Copyright and the Limits of Cultural Policy, 14 Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal 625 (1996)
• Jerome H. Reichman, Charting the Collapse of the Patent-Copyright Dichotomy: Premises for a Restructured International Intellectual Property System, 13 Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal 475 (1995)
• Jerome H. Reichman, Universal Minimum Standards of Intellectual Property Protection under the TRIPS Component of the WTO Agreement, 29 International Lawyer 345 (1995)
• Jerome H. Reichman, A Manifesto Concerning the Legal Protection of Computer Programs, 94 Columbia Law Review 2308 (1994)
• Jerome H. Reichman, Legal Hybrids between the Patent and Copyright Paradigms, 94 Columbia Law Review 2432 (1994)
• Jerome H. Reichman, Past and Current Trends in the Evolution of Design Protection Law- A Comment, 4 Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal 387 (1993)
• Jerome H. Reichman, The TRIPs Component of the GATT’s Uruguay Round: Competitive Prospects for Intellectual Property Owners in an Integrated World Market, 4 Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal 171 (1993)
• Jerome H. Reichman, Design Protection and the Legislative Agenda, 55 Law & Contemporary Problems 281 (1992)
• Jerome H. Reichman, Electronic Information Tools - The Outer Edge of World Intellectual Property Law, 17 University of Dayton Law Review 797 (1992)
• Jerome H. Reichman, Overlapping Proprietary Rights in University-Generated Research Products: The Case of Computer Programs, 17 Columbia-VLA Journal of Law & the Arts 51 (1992)
• Jerome H. Reichman, Goldstein on Copyright Law: A Realist’s Approach to a Technological Age, 43 Stanford Law Review 943 (1990)
• Jerome H. Reichman, Computer Programs as Applied Scientific Know-How: Implications of Copyright Protection for Commercialized University Research, 42 Vanderbilt Law Review 639 (1989)
• Jerome H. Reichman, Design Protection and the New Technologies: The United States Experience in a Transnational Perspective, 19 University of Baltimore Law Review 6 (1989)
• Jerome H. Reichman, Intellectual Property in International Trade: Opportunities and Risks of a GATT Connection, 22 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 747 (1989)
• Jerome H. Reichman, Design Protection in Domestic and Foreign Copyright Law: From the Berne Revision of 1948 to the Copyright Act of 1976, 32 Duke Law Journal 1143 (1983)
• Jerome H. Reichman, Introduction: Mini-Symposium: International Public Goods and the Transfer of Technology Under a Globalized Intellectual Property Regime, 7(2) Journal of International Economic Law 275 (2004)
• Jerome H. Reichman, Intellectual Property Rights in Data?, 50 Vanderbilt Law Review 52 (1997)
• Jerome H. Reichman, Database Protection at the Crossroads: Recent Development and Their Impact on Science and Technology, 14 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 793 (1999)
• Curtis A. Bradley, Territorial Intellectual Property Rights in an Age of Globalism, 37 Virginia Journal of International Law 505 (1997)
• David L. Lange, At Play in the Fields of the Word: Copyright and the Construction of Authorship in the Post-Literate Millennium, 55 Law & Contemporary Problems 139 (1992)
• Yoav Oestreicher, Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Intellectual Property Judgments: Analysis and Guidelines for a New International Convention, S.J.D. Dissertation, Duke University School of Law, Duke University (2004)
• Arti K. Rai, Synthetic Biology: The Intellectual Property Puzzle, 85 Texas Law Review 1745 (2007)
• Arti K. Rai, Synthetic Biology: Caught Between Property Rights, the Public Domain, and the Commons, PLoS Biology, March 2007 5(3) (2007)
• Arti K. Rai, Regulating Scientific Research: Intellectual Property Rights and the Norms of Science, 94 Northwestern University Law Review 77 (1999)
• Arti K. Rai, Intellectual Property Rights in Biotechnology: Addressing New Technology, 34 Wake Forest Law Review 827 (1999)
• Arti K. Rai, Evolving Scientific Norms and Intellectual Property Rights: A Reply to Kieff, 95 Northwestern University Law Review 707 (2000)
• Jedediah Purdy, A Freedom-Promoting Approach to Property: A Renewed Tradition for New Debates, 72 University of Chicago Law Review 1237 (2005)
• David L. Lange, Recognizing the Public Domain, 44(Autumn) Law & Contemporary Problems 147 (1981)
• David L. Lange, Copyright and the Constitution in the Age of Intellectual Property, 1 Journal of Intellectual Property Law 119 (1993)
• David L. Lange, Sensing the Constitution in ’Feist’, 17 University of Dayton Law Review 367 (1992)
• David L. Lange, The Intellectual Property Clause in Contemporary Trademark Law: An Appreciation of Two Recent Essays and Some Thoughts About Why We ought To Care, 59(Spring) Law & Contemporary Problems 213 (1996)
• Catherine Fisk, Working Knowledge: Trade Secrets, Restrictive Covenants in Employment, and the Rise of Corporate Intellectual Property, 52 Hastings Law Journal 441 (2001)
• Catherine Fisk, Credit Where It’s Due: The Law and Norms of Attribution, 95(1) Georgetown Law Journal 49 (2006)
• James Boyle, Intellectual Property Policy Online: A Young Person’s Guide, 10 Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 47 (1996)
• James Boyle, A Politics of Intellectual Property: Environmentalism for the Net?, 47 Duke Law Journal 87 (1997)
• James Boyle, Cruel, Mean, or Lavish? Economic Analysis, Price Discrimination and Digital Intellectual Property, 53 Vanderbilt Law Review 2007 (2000)
• Arti K. Rai, Fostering Cumulative Innovation in the Biopharmaceutical Industry: The Role of Patents and Antitrust, 16 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 813 (2001)
• Arti K. Rai, Harnessing and Sharing the Benefits of State Sponsored Research, 21 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 1187 (2006)
• Doriane Lambelet Coleman, Internationalizing the Copyright Code: An Analysis of Legislative Proposals Seeking Adherence to the Berne Convention, 76 Georgetown Law Journal 467 (1987)
• Megan Ristau Baca, Barriers to Innovation: Intellectual Property Transaction Costs in Scientific Collaboration, 2006 Duke Law & Technology Review 0004 (2006)
• James Boyle, A Manifesto on WIPO and the Future of Intellectual Property, 2004 Duke Law & Technology Review 0009 (2004)
• Zia K. Cromer, China’s WAPI Policy: Security Measure or Trade Protectionism?, 2005 Duke Law & Technology Review 0018 (2005)
• Jasper A. Bovenberg, Mining the Common Heritage of Our DNA: Lessons Learned from Grotius and Pardo, 2006 Duke Law & Technology Review 0008 (2006)
• Cortney M. Arnold, Protecing Intellectual Property in the Developing World: Next Stop-Thailand, 2006 Duke Law & Technology Review 0010 (2006)
• Adam R. Tarosky, The Constitutionality of WIPO’s Broadcasting Treaty: the Originality and Limited Times Requirements of the Copyright Clause, 2006 Duke Law & Technology 0016 (2006)
• Carlos M. Correa, Implications of the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, WHO/EDM Commissioned Report (2002)
• James Love, Remuneration guidelines for non-voluntary use of a patent on medical technologies, Health Economics and Drugs, TCM Series No. 18 (2005)
• Carlos M. Correa, Protection of Data Submitted for the Registration of Pharmaceuticals: Implementing the Standards of the TRIPs Agreement, South Perspective, (South Centre, Geneva, 2002) (2002)
• Michael R. Taylor, American Patent Policy, Biotechnology, and African Agriculture: the Case for Policy Change, 17(2) Harvard Journal of Law & Technology (2004)
• Marci A. Hamilton, Computer Science Concepts in Copyright Cases: the Path to a Coherent Law, 10(2) Harvard Journal of Law & Technology (1997)
• Shubha Ghosh, The Merits of Ownership; or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Intellectual Property: Review Essay of Lawrence Lessig, The Future of Ideas, and Siva Vaidhyanathan, Copyrights and Copywrongs, 15(2) Harvard Journal of Law & Technology (2002)
• Robert M. Sherwood, Intellectual Property Systems and Investment Stimulation: The Rating of Systems in Eighteen Developing Countries, 37(2) IDEA: The Journal of Law and Technology 261 (1997)
• Robert M. Sherwood, Promotion of inventiveness in developing countries through a more advanced patent administration, 39(4) IDEA: The Journal of Law and Technology 473 (1999)
• Christoph Antons, Intellectual Property Law in Southeast Asia: Recent Legislative and Institutional Developments, 2006(1) Journal of Information, Law & Technology (2006)
• Graham Dutfield, "To copy is to steal": TRIPS, (un)free trade agreements and the new intellectual property fundamentalism, 2006(1) Journal of Information, Law & Technology (2006)
• Assafa Endeshaw, Intellectual Property and the "WIPO Development Agenda", 2006(1) Journal of Information, Law & Technology (2006)
• Michael D. Pendleton, The Digital Divide-International Enforcement of Digital Lockup, 2006(1) Journal of Information, Law & Technology (2006)
• Ke Shao, What may validate intellectual property in a traditional Chinese mind? Examining the U.S.-China IP disputes through a historical inquiry, 2006(1) Journal of Information, Law & Technology (2006)
• Peter K. Yu, International Enclosure, the Regime Complex, and Intellectual Property Schizophrenia, 2007(1) Michigan State Law Review 1 (2007)
• Keith Aoki, Reclaiming “Common Heritage” Treatment in the International Plant Genetic Resources Regime Complex, 2007(1) Michigan State Law Review 35 (2007)
• Denis Borges Barbosa, Slouching Towards Development in International Intellectual Property, 2007(1) Michigan State Law Review 71 (2007)
• Peter M. Gerhart, The Tragedy of TRIPS, 2007(1) Michigan State Law Review 143 (2007)
• Donald P. Harris, TRIPS and Treaties of Adhesion Part II: Back to the Past or a Small Step Forward?, 2007(1) Michigan State Law Review 185 (2007)
• Chidi Oguamanam, Agro-Biodiversity and Food Security: Biotechnology and Traditional Agricultural Practices at the Periphery of International Intellectual Property Regime Complex, 2007(1) Michigan State Law Review 215 (2007)
• Guy Pessach, The Role of Libraries in A2K: Taking Stock and Looking Ahead, 2007(1) Michigan State Law Review 257 (2007)
• Paul L.C. Torremans, Is Copyright a Human Right?, 2007(1) Michigan State Law Review 271 (2007)
• Peter K. Yu, Of Monks, Medieval Scribes, and Middlemen, 2006(1) Michigan State Law Review 1 (2006)
• Lawrence Lessig, The Second Annual Distinguished Lecture in Intellectual Property and Communications Law: Creative Economics, 2006(1) Michigan State Law Review 33 (2006)
• Michael W. Carroll, Creative Commons and the New Intermediaries, 2006(1) Michigan State Law Review 45 (2006)
• Thomas F. Cotter, Some Observations on the Law and Economics of Intermediaries, 2006(1) Michigan State Law Review 67 (2006)
• Robert A. Heverly, Law as Intermediary, 2006(1) Michigan State Law Review 107 (2006)
• Matt Jackson, The Technological Revolution Will Not Be Televised: Canadian Copyright and Internet Transmissions, 2006(1) Michigan State Law Review 133 (2006)
• Michael H. Madison, Social Software, Groups, and Governance, 2006(1) Michigan State Law Review 153 (2006)
• Margaret Ann Wilkinson, The Public Interest in Moral Rights Protection, 2006(1) Michigan State Law Review 193 (2006)
• Peter K. Yu, Intellectual Property and the Information Ecosystem, 2005(1) Michigan State Law 1 (2005)
• Johannes M. Bauer, An Integrated Framework for Assessing Broadband Policy Options, 2005(1) Michigan State Law Review 21 (2005)
• Jim Chen, Biodiversity and Biotechnology: A Misunderstood Relation, 2005(1) Michigan State Law Review 51 (2005)
• Richard A. Epstein, The Roman Law of Cyberconversion, 2005(1) Michigan State Law Review 103 (2005)
• Daniel Gervais, Traditional Knowledge & Intellectual Property: A TRIPs-Compatible Approach, 2005(1) Michigan State Law Review 137 (2005)
• Llewellyn Joseph Gibbons, Digital Bowdlerizing: Removing the Naughty Bytes, 2005(1) Michigan State Law Review 167 (2005)
• Bill Hennessey, Changing Traffic Patterns in Technospace, 2005(1) Michigan State Law Review 201 (2005)
• Keith E. Maskus, Using the International Trading System to Foster Technology Transfer for Economic Development, 2005(1) Michigan State Law Review 219 (2005)
• Lars Smith, Trade Distinctiveness: Solving Scalia’s Tertium Quid Trade Dress Conundrum, 2005(1) Michigan State Law Review 243 (2005)
• David W. Opderbeck, Patents, Essential Medicines, and the Innovation Game, Working Paper Series ()
• Henning Grosse Ruse-Khan, A Pirate of the Caribbean? The Attraction of Suspending TRIPS Obligations, 11(2) Journal of International Economic Law 313-364 (2008)
• Radhika Bhattacharya, Are Develloping Countries Going Too Far on TRIPS? A Closer Look at the New Laws in India, 34 American Journal of Law & Medicine 395-421 (2008)
• Kasturi Das, Select Issues and Debates around Geographical Indications with Particular Reference to India, 42:3 Journal of World Trade 461-508 ()
• Maria Victoria Stout, The TRIPS Nondiscrimination Line: How CAFTA Pharmaceutical Patent Provisions Violate TRIPS Article 27.1, 14 Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law 177 (2008)
• David Snyder, Protections for Geographical Indications under TRIPS: Potential Conflicts under the U.S. Constitutional and Statutory Regimes, 18 Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal 1297 (2008)
• Stefania Fusco, Geographical Indications: A Discussion on the TRIPS Regulation after the Ministerial Conference of Hong Kong, 12 Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review 197 (2008)
• Yoshifumi Fukunaga, Enforcing TRIPS: Challenges of Adjudicating Minimum Standards Agreements, 23 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 867 (2008)
• Charles T. Collins-Chase, The Case against TRIPS-Plus Protection in Developing Countries Facing AIDS Epidemics, 29 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 763 (2008)
• Graham Dutfield, Delivering Drugs to the Poor: Will the TRIPS Amendment Help?, 34 American Journal of Law and Medicine 107 (2008)
• Kevin Outterson, Should Access to Medicines and TRIPS Flexibilities Be Limited to Specific Diseases?, 34 American Journal of Law and Medicine 279 (2008)
• Linda L. Lee, Trials and TRIPS-Ulations: Indian Patent Law and Novartis Ag v. Union of India, 23 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 281 (2008)
• Tina s. Bhatt, Amending TRIPS: A New Hope for Increased Access to Essential Medicines, 33 Brooklyn Journal of International Law 597 (2008)
• Vera Zolotaryova, Are We There Yet? Taking “TRIPS” To Brazil and Expanding Access to HIV/Aids Medication, 33 Brooklyn Journal of International Law 1099 (2008)
• Siddharth Fernandes, A Realistic Analysis Of § 271(G) and the ITC: Academic Hypotheses Aside, § 271(G) Does Not Violate the Paris Convention or TRIPS Because Its Affirmative Defenses Do Not Apply To § 337 Actions before t, 17 Federal Circuit Bar Journal 473 (2008)
• Stephanie Skees, Thai-ing up the TRIPS Agreement: Are Compulsory Licenses the answer to Thailand’s AIDS Epidemic?, 19 Pace International Law Review 233-285 (2007)
• Peter Yu, Access to medicines, BRICS Alliance, and Collective Action, 34 American J. of Law & Medicine 345-394 (2008)
• Antony Taubman, Rethinking Trips: ‘Adequate Remuneration’ For Non-Voluntary Patent Licensing, 11 Journal of International Economic Law 927 (2008)
• Graham Dutfield, Delivering Drugs To The Poor: Will The Trips Amendment Help?, 34 American Journal of Law and Medicine 107 (2008)
• Jack Lerner, Intellectual Property And Development At WHO and WIPO, 34 American Journal of Law and Medicine 257 (2008)
• Kevin Outterson, Should Access To Medicines And TRIPS Flexibilities Be Limited To Specific Diseases?, 34 American Journal of Law and Medicine 279 (2008)
• Brook K. Baker, Ending Drug Registration Apartheid: Taming Data Exclusivity And Patent/Registration Linkage, 34 American Journal of Law and Medicine 303 (2008)
• Daniel Gervais, The Google Book Settlement and the TRIPS Agreement, 2011 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 1 (2011)
• Matthew Kennedy, When Will the Protocol Amending the TRIPS Agreement Enter Into Force?, 13 J. Int'l Econ. L. 459 (2010)
• Sujitha Subramanian, EU Obligation to the TRIPS Agreement: EU Microsoft Decision, 21 Eur. J. Int'l L. 997 (2010)
• Allison Whiteman, Cross Retaliation Under the TRIPS Agreement: An Analysis of Policy Options for Brazil, 36 N.C. J. Int'l L. & Com. Reg. 187 (2010)
• Marla Mellino, The TRIPS Agreement: Helping or Hurting Least Developed Countries' Access to Essential Pharmaceuticals?, 20 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 1349 (2010)
• Cydney Fowler, Ending Genetic Monopolies: How the TRIPS Agreement's Failure to Exclude Gene Patents Thwarts Innovation and Hurts Consumers Worldwide, 25 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 1073 (2010)
• Alberto Alemanno, Do You Mind My Smoking? Plain Packaging of Cigarettes Under the TRIPS Agreement, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 450 (2011)
• Henning Grosse Ruse - Khan, A Trade Agreement Creating Barriers to International Trade?: Acta Border Measures and Goods in Transit, 26 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 645 (2011)
• Deepa Varadarajan, A Trade Secret Approach to Protecting Traditional Knowledge, 36 Yale J. Int'l 371 (2011)
• Brook K. Baker, ACTA -- Risks of Third-Party Enforcement for Access to Medicines, 26 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 579 (2011)
• Sean Flynn, ACTA's Constitutional Problem: The Treaty is not a Treaty, 26 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 903 (2011)
• Margot E. Kaminski, An Overview and the Evolution of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, 21 Alb. L.J. Sci. & Tech. 385 (2011)
• Mirela V. Hristova, Are Intellectual Property Rights Human Rights?, 93 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc'y 339 (2011)
• Daniel R. Cahoy, Breaking Patents, 32 Mich. J. Int'l L. 461 (2011)
• Carmen O. Castro Pagan, Business Method Patents: A Controversy for Companies, 50 Rev. Der P.R. 239 (2011)
• Ysolde Gendreau, Canada and the Three-Step Test: A Step in Which Direction?, 15 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 309 (2011)
• Matthew J. Pinkerton, Considering the Next Generation of Innovators: Incorporating the Needs of Start-Ups into the United States Patent and Trademark Office's Intellectual Property Strategy, 23 Pac. McGeorge Global Bus. & Dev. L.J. 313 (2011)
• John Mukum Mbaku, Copyright and Democratization in Africa, 7 B.Y.U. Int'l L. & Mgmt. Rev. 51 (2011)
• Courtney Maccarone, Crossing Borders: A TRIPS-Like Treaty on Quarantines and Human Rights, 36 Brook. J. Int'l L. 781 (2011)
• Eugene C. Lim, Dilution, The Section 22 Debacle, and the Protection of Business Goodwill in Canada: Some Insights From U.S. Trademark Law and Policy, 101 Trademark Rep. 1232 (2011)
• Catherine Dounis, Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights Via EU Border Regulations: Inhibiting Access to Medicine or Preventing Counterfeit Medicine?, 36 Brook. J. Int'l L. 717 (2011)
• Craig E. Walter, Extraterritorial Software Protection Under § 271(F): A Call to Congress to Fix a Statute that was Not Broken, 48 Hous. L. Rev. 129 (2011)
• Emily Nation, Georgraphical Indications: The International Debate Over Intellectual Property Rights for Local Producers, 82 U. Colo. L. Rev. 959 (2011)
• Cynthia M. Ho, Global Access to Medicine: The Influence of Competing Patent Perspectives, 35 Fordham Int'l L.J. 1 (2011)
• Daniel Gervais, Golan v. Holder: A Look at the Constraints Imposed by the Berne Convention, 64 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 147 (2011)
• David L. Lange, Golan v. Holder: Copyright in the Image of the First Amendment, 11 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 83 (2011)
• Adam Chilton, India's Evolving Patent Laws and WTO Obligations: The Rejection of Abbott Laboratories' Application for a New Kaletra Patent, 39 J.L. Med. & Ethics 296 (2011)
• Benedetta Ubertazzi, Intellectual Property Rights and Exclusive (Subject Matter) Jurisdiction: Between Private and Public International Law, 15 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 357 (2011)
• Marianne Buckley, Looking Inward: Regional Parallel Trade as a Means of Bringing Affordable Drugs to Africa, 41 Seton Hall L. Rev. 625 (2011)
• W. Lesser, Measuring Intellectual Property 'Strength' and Effects: An Assessment of Patent Scoring Systems and Causality, 4 J. Bus. Entrepreneurship & L. 345 (2011)
• Edward Lee, Measuring TRIPS Compliance and Defiance: The WTO Compliance Scoreboard, 18 J. Intell. Prop. L. 401 (2011)
• Dongwook Chun, Patent Law Harmonization in the Age of Globalization: The Necessity and Strategy for a Pragmatic Outcome, 93 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc'y 127 (2011)
• Weighou Zhou, Pirates Behind an Ajar Door, and an Ocean Away: U.S.-China WTO Disputes, Intellectual Property Protection, and Market Access, 25 Temp. Int'l & Comp. L.J. 139 (2011)
• A. Samuel Oddi, Plagues, Pandemics, and Patents: Legality and Morality, 51 IDEA 1 (2011)
• Chang-fa Lo, Potential Conflict Between TRIPS and GATT Concerning Parallel Importation of Drugs and Possible Solution to Prevent Undesirable Market Segmentation, 66 Food & Drug L.J. 73 (2011)
• Eve Heafey, Public Access to Science: The New Policy of the National Institutes of Health in Light of Copyright Protections in National and International Law, 15 UCLA J. L. & Tech. 1 (2011)
• Lily Endean Nierenberg, Reconciling the Right to Food and Trade LIberalization: Developing Country Opportunities, 20 Minn. J. Int'l L. 619 (2011)
• Boris N. Mamlyuk, Russia & Legal Harmonization: An Historical Inquiry into IP Reform as Global Convergence and Resistance, 10 Wash. U. Global Stud. L. Rev. 535 (2011)
• Peter K. Yu, Six Secret (And Now Open) Fears of ACTA, 64 SMU L. Rev. 975 (2011)
• Jennifer R. Andrew, Swine Flu, Bird Flu, SARS, Oh My! Applying the Precautionary Principle to Compulsory Licensing of Pharmaceuticals Under Article 31 of TRIPS, 2011 Mich. St. L. Rev. 405 (2011)
• Khaliunaa Garamgaibaatar, The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement: Copyrights, Intermediaries, and Digital Pirates, 20 CommLaw Conspectus 199 (2011)
• Darryl C. Wilson, The Caribbean Intellectual Property Office (CARIPO): New, Useful, and Necessary, 19 Mich. St. J. Int'l L. 551 (2011)
• James E. Darnton, The Coming of Age of the Global Trademark: The Effect of TRIPS on the Well-Known Marks Exception to the Principle of Territoriality, 20 Mich. St. Int'l. L. Rev. 11 (2011)
• Mindy Pava, The Cuban Conundrum: Proposing an International Trademark Registry for Well-Known Foreign Marks, 25 Emory Int'l L. Rev. 631 (2011)
• Shamima Ahmed, The Impact of NGOs on International Organizations: Complexities and Considerations, 36 Brook. J. Int'l L. 817 (2011)
• Henning Grosse Ruse-khan, The International Law Relation Between TRIPS and Subsequent TRIPS-Plus Free Trade Agreements: Towards Safeguarding TRIPS Flexibilities?, 18 J. Intell. Prop. L. 325 (2011)
• Joshua D. Sarnoff, The Patent System and Climate Change, 16 Va. J.L. & Tech. 301 (2011)
• Rachel Brewster, The Surprising Benefits to Developing Countries of Linking International Trade and Intellectual Property, 12 Chi. J. Int'l L. 1 (2011)
• Peter K. Yu, The TRIPS Enforcement Dispute, 89 Neb. L. Rev. 1046 (2011)
• William M. Fischer, The Utah Bioprospecting Act of 2010: (Unintentional) State-Level Implementation of the United Nations Convention on Biodiversity, 10 J. Telecomm. & High Tech. L. 197 (2012)
• Patricia L. Judd, Towards a TRIPS Truce, 32 Mich. J. Int'l L. 613 (2011)
• Anna Bitencourt Emilio, Tripping over TRIPS and the Global HIV/AIDS Epidemic: Legislation and Political Decisions in Brazil and the United States, 28 J. Contemp. Health L. & Pol'y 57 (2011)
• Donald Harris, TRIPS after Fifteen Years: Success or Failure, as Measured by Compulsory Licensing, 18 J. Intell. Prop. L. 367 (2011)
• Peter K. Yu, TRIPS and its Achilles' Heel, 18 J. Intell. Prop. L. 479 (2011)
• Peter K. Yu, TRIPS Enforcement and Developing Countries, 26 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 727 (2011)
• Angelica Bonfanti, TRIPS on the High Seas: Intellectual Property Rights on Marine Genetic Resources, 37 Brook. J. Int'l L. 187 (2011)
• Susan K. Sell, TRIPS Was Never Enough: Vertical Forum Shifting, FTAS, ACTA, and TPP, 18 J. Intell. Prop. L. 447 (2011)
• Scott Taylor, Where Are the Green Machines?: Using the Patent System to Encourage Green Invention and Technology Transfer, 23 Geo. Int'l Envtl. L. Rev. 577 (2011)
• Melissa Y. Lerner, You Can Run, But You Can't Hide: The Expansion of Direct Infringement and the Evisceration of Preventive Contracting in Maersk, 93 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc'y 207 (2011)
• Mark Davison, The Legitimacy of Plain Packaging Under International Intellectual Property Law: Why There is No Right to Use a Trademark Under Either the Paris Convention or the Trips Agreement, PUBLIC HEALTH AND PLAIN PACKAGING OF CIGARETTES: LEGAL ISSUES, A. Mitchell, T. Voon and J. Liberman, eds., Edward Elgar, 2012 (2012 )
• Mark Davison , Plain Packaging and the TRIPS Agreement: A Response to Professor Gervais, (2013) 23 AIPJ 160 (2013)
• Daniel J. Gervais , Plain Packaging and the Interpretation of the TRIPS Agreement, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Forthcoming (2013)
• Mark Davison , Plain Packaging of Tobacco and the 'Right' to Use a Trade Mark, European Intellectual Property Review, No. 8, pp. 498-501, 2012 (2012)
• Tania Voon, Flexibilities In WTO Law To Support Tobacco Control Regulation, 39 Am. J.L. & Med. 199 (2013)
• Kimberly Shane, Culture, Poverty, And Trademarks: An Overview Of The Creation And Persistence Of Chinese Counterfeiting And How To Combat It, 16 Intell. Prop. L. Bull. 137 (2012)
• Valentina Sara Vadi , Global Health Governance At A Crossroads: Trademark Protection V. Tobacco Control In International Investment Law, 48 Stan. J. Int'l L. 93 (2012)
• Jonathan Liberman, Combating counterfeit medicines and illicit trade in tobacco products: minefields in global health governance, 40 J.L. Med. & Ethics 326 (2012)
• Josef Ostranský , Tobacco Investment Disputes – Public Policy, Fragmentation of International Law and Echoes of the Calvo Doctrine, Czech Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 3, 2012, 161 (2012)
• Edward Lee, The Global Trade Mark, (2011)
• Alberto Alemanno, Do You Mind My Smoking? Plain Packaging of Cigarettes Under the TRIPS Agreement, John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2011 (2011)
• Mindy Pava, The Cuban Conundrum: Proposing An International Trademark Registry For Well-Known Foreign Marks, 25 Emory Int'l L. Rev. 631 (2011)
• Doris Estelle Long , REBOOTING TRADEMARKS FOR THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY, 49 U. Louisville L. Rev. 517 (2013)
• Benjamin A. Hackman, On The Mark? Big Tobacco Asserts Property Rights On Cigarette Packaging, 29 Penn St. Int'l L. Rev. 809 (2011)
• Rita Heimes, Trademarks, Identity, And Justice, 11 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 133 (2011)
• Peter K. Yu, Are Developing Countries Playing a Better TRIPS Game?, UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs, Vol. 16, 311-42, 2011 (2011)
• Molly Land , Adjudicating TRIPS for Development, NYLS Legal Studies Research Paper No. 47 (2012)
• Michael Leslie Blakeney, Intellectual Property and Economic Development in Sub-Saharan Africa, The Journal of World Intellectual Property, Vol. 14, pp. 238–264, 2011 (2012)
• Frederick M. Abbott , Technical Note: The LDC TRIPS Transition Extension and the Question of Rollback, Policy Brief No. 15, (2013) International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD), Geneva, Switzerland (2013)
• Matt Richter, Spurring Innovation In Uganda: Strategies To Assist Developing Countries In Drafting TRIPS-Compliant Patent Legislation That Fosters University Research And Innovation, 30 Wis. Int'l L.J. 229 (2012)
• Rachel Brewster, The Surprising Benefits To Developing Countries Of Linking International Trade And Intellectual Property, 12 Chi. J. Int'l L. 1 (2011)
• Rishi R. Gupta, Compulsory Licensing In TRIPS: Chinese And Indian Comparative Advantage In The Manufacture And Exportation Of Green Technologies, 12 Sustainable Dev. L. & Pol'y 21 (2012)
• Sunil Kanwar, Intellectual Property Protection And Technology Licensing: The Case Of Developing Countries, 55 J.L. & Econ. 539 (2012)
• Garrett Halydier, A Hybrid Legal And Economic Development Model That Balances Intellectual Property Protection And Economic Growth: A Case Study Of India, Brazil, Indonesia, And Vietnam, 14 Asian-Pacific L. & Pol'y J. 86 (2012)
• Angelos Dimopoulos, Of Trips and Traps: The Interpretative Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the EU Over Patent Law, TILEC Discussion Paper No. 2012-025 (2012)
• Cynthia M. Ho, Complicated Compulsory Licenses: The Waiver/Article31bis 'Solution', Loyola University Chicago School of Law Research Paper No. 2011-032 (2011)
• Kamini Shan, The Legal Challenges Faced by the Pharmaceutical Industry Particularly in India: An Analysis of the Compulsory Licensing System and Section 3(D) of the Patents Amendment Act 2005, (2012)
• Cynthia M. Ho, Compulsory Licenses Under TRIPS: An Introduction, Loyola University Chicago School of Law Research Paper NO. 2011-030 (2012)
• Richard Li-dar Wang , Ancillary Orders of Compulsory Licensing and Their Compatibility with the Trips Agreement, (2013)
• Eugenio Hoss, Delays in Patent Examination and Their Implications under the TRIPS Agreement, MIPLC Master Thesis Series (2010/11) (2011)
• Peter B. Rutledge, TRIPS AND BITS: AN ESSAY ON COMPULSORY LICENSES, EXPROPRIATION, AND INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION, 13 N.C. J.L. & Tech. On. 149 (2012)
• Christina Bucci, RESPONSIBLE PATENT PROTECTIONS: PRESERVING PUBLIC HEALTH OBJECTIVES IN THE TRANS-PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT, 26 Pac. McGeorge Global Bus. & Dev. L.J. 213 (2013)
• Steven Rushing, PLUGGING THE LEAK IN § 1498: COERCING THE UNITED STATES INTO NOTIFYING PATENT OWNERS OF GOVERNMENT USE, 45 Vand. J. Transnat'l L. 879 (2012)
• Matthew Rimmer , Patents for Humanity, (2012) 3 (2) The World Intellectual Property Organization WIPO Journal 196-221 (2012)
• LAWRENCE A. KOGAN, COMMERCIAL HIGH TECHNOLOGY INNOVATIONS FACE UNCERTAIN FUTURE AMID EMERGING “BRICS” COMPULSORY LICENSING AND IT INTEROPERABILITY FRAMEWORKS, 13 San Diego Int'l L.J. 201 (2011)
• William Hubbard , COMPETITIVE PATENT LAW, 65 Fla. L. Rev. 341 (2012)
• Cynthia M. Ho, Compulsory License Case Study: An Introduction to Competing Patent Perspectives, Loyola University Chicago School of Law Research Paper No. 2011-031 (2011)
• Peter K. Yu, The First Decade of TRIPS in China, Drake University Law School Research Paper No. 12-38 (2012)
• Frederick M. Abbott, China in the WTO 2006: 'Law and its Limitations' in the Context of TRIPS, TO LAW AND DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, pp. 59-81, G. Bermann, P. Mavroidis, eds., Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007 (2011)
• Chien-Huei Wu, How Does TRIPS Transform Chinese Administrative Law?, Global Jurist, 8(1Topics): Article 6 (2013)
• Natalie P Stoianoff, The Influence of the WTO over China's Intellectual Property Regime, 34 Sydney L. Rev. 65 (2012)
• Emily Gische, Repercussions Of China's High-Tech Rise: Protection And Enforcement Of Intellectual Property Rights In China, 63 Hastings L.J. 1393 (2012)
• S. James Boumil III, CHINA'S INDIGENOUS INNOVATION POLICIES UNDER THE TRIPS AND GPA AGREEMENTS AND ALTERNATIVES FOR PROMOTING ECONOMIC GROWTH, 12 Chi. J. Int'l L. 755 (2012)
• Kiel Downey, Intellectual Property Rights And Renewable Energy Technology Transfer In China, 9 S.C. J. Int'l. L. & Bus. 89 (2012)
• Amy E. Conroy, THE GRAY (GOODS) ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM: CHINA'S TROUBLING ATTITUDE TOWARD IP PROTECTION OF GRAY MARKET GOODS, 36 Brook. J. Int'l L. 1075 (2011)
• Leroy J. Pelicci, Jr., CHINA AND THE ANTI-COUNTERFEITING TRADE AGREEMENT - ACTA FAITH, OR ACTA FUTILITY?: AN EXPOSITION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ENFORCEMENT IN THE AGE OF SHANZHAI, 1 Penn St. J. L. & Int'l Aff. 121 (2012)
• Benjamin Piwei Liu, CHINESE PATENTS AS COPYRIGHTS, 34 Campbell L. Rev. 685 (2012)
• Michael Leslie Blakeney , Geographical Indications and TRIPS, UWA Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2012-09 (2012)
• Malobika Banerji, GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS: WHICH WAY SHOULD ASEAN GO?, 2012 B.C. Intell. Prop. & Tech. F. 1 (2012)
• Lucas S. Michels, A BLUEPRINT FOR INTERNATIONAL TRIPS PLUS GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATION PROTECTIONS? AN ANALYSIS OF GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATION PROTECTION PROPOSALS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION - INDIA BILATERAL TRADE AND INVESTMENT , 15 Gonz. J. Int'l L. 2 (2012)
• Dev Saif Gangjee , Relocating Geographical Indications, Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law Series, Forthcoming (2011)
• Emily Nation, GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS: THE INTERNATIONAL DEBATE OVER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS FOR LOCAL PRODUCERS, 82 U. Colo. L. Rev. 959 (2011)
• Cynthia M. Ho , Freedom under TRIPS: India as an Example, Loyola University Chicago School of Law Research Paper No. 2011-025 (2011)
• Sunil Kumar Agarwal , Trips-Plus Agenda Through Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement: Implications for India, (2011)
• Sukanya Narain , The NATCO Decision: Bringing into the Indian Patent Practice the TRIPs Flexibility of Compulsory Licensing, (2012)
• Ajay Bhaskarabhatla, First-Mover Advantages Before and After TRIPS: Evidence from the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry, (2012)
• Harunrashid Kadri, Post-TRIPS Patenting Trends in India with Special Reference to USA: A Comparative Analysis, (2011)
• Levon Barsoumian, INDIA'S USE IT OR LOSE IT: TIME TO REVISIT TRIPS?, 11 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 797 (2012)
• Melissa O. Nonaka, ENOUGH IS ENOUGH: INDIA'S FIGHT AGAINST SEIZURES OF LAWFUL GENERIC MEDICINES, 16 Mich. St. U. J. Med. & L. 37 (2011)
• V.K. Unni, INDIAN PATENT LAW AND TRIPS: REDRAWING THE FLEXIBILITY FRAMEWORK IN THE CONTEXT OF PUBLIC POLICY AND HEALTH, 25 Pac. McGeorge Global Bus. & Dev. L.J. 323 (2012)
• Enrico Bonadio, India Grants a Compulsory Licence of Bayer's Patented Cancer Drug: The Issue of Local Working Requirement, 3 Eur. J. Risk Reg. 247 (2012)
• Nattapong Suwan-in , Compulsory License, a Long Debate on TRIPS Agreement Interpretation: Discovering the Truth of Thailand’s Imposition on Pharmaceutical Patents, Asian Journal of WTO & International Health Law and Policy, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 225-261 (2012)
• Mingchanok Tejavanija, A NEW KIND OF DRUG WAR: THAILAND'S TAKING ON THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY TO IMPROVE ACCESS TO HIV/AIDS DRUGS THROUGH THE USE OF COMPULSORY LICENSING, 28 Ariz. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 659 (2011)
• Peter K. Yu, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND ASIAN VALUES, 16 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 329 (2011)
• Molly Land , Rebalancing TRIPS, Michigan Journal of International Law, Vol. 33, 2012 (2012)
• Peter K. Yu , Intellectual Property and Human Rights in the Nonmultilateral Era, Florida Law Review, Vol. 64, pp. 1045-1100 (2011)
• Arno Hold, Transitioning to Intellectual Property: How Can the WTO Integrate Least-Developed Countries into TRIPS?, NCCR Working Paper 2012/37 (2012)
• Christophe Geiger , The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement and Criminal Enforcement of Intellectual Property: What Consequences for the European Union?, Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property & Competition Law Research Paper No. 12-04 (2012)
• Duncan Matthews , The Rise and Fall of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA): Lessons for the European Union, Queen Mary School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 127/2012 (2012)
• Rosa Castro , Compulsory Licensing and Public Health: TRIPS-Plus Standards in Investment Agreements, Transnational Dispute Management TDM, Forthcoming (2009)
• Lisa Forman , From TRIPS-Plus to Rights-Plus? Exploring Right to Health Impact Assessment of Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights Through the Thai Experience, Asian Journal of WTO and International Health Law and Policy, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 347-375, 2012 (2012)
• Mike Palmedo , The Economic Effect of the Intellectual Property Obligations in Free Trade Agreements, American University - Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property (2012)
• MIRIAM BITTON, RETHINKING THE ANTI-COUNTERFEITING TRADE AGREEMENT'S CRIMINAL COPYRIGHT ENFORCEMENT MEASURES, 102 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 67 (2012)
• Sean M. Flynnd, THE U.S. PROPOSAL FOR AN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CHAPTER IN THE TRANS-PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT, 28 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 105 (2012)
• Peter K. Yu, The ACTA Committee, Drake University Law School Research Paper No. 12-34 (2012)
• Christina Eckes, INTERNATIONAL, EUROPEAN, AND U.S. PERSPECTIVES ON THE NEGOTIATION AND ADOPTION OF THE ANTI-COUNTERFEITING TRADE AGREEMENT (ACTA), 20-SUM Currents: Int'l Trade L.J. 20 (2012)
• Kimberlee Weatherall, THREE LESSONS FROM ACTA AND ITS POLITICAL AFTERMATH, 35 Suffolk Transnat'l L. Rev. 575 (2012)
• Kimberlee Weatherall, ACTA AS A NEW KIND OF INTERNATIONAL IP LAWMAKING, 26 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 839 (2011)
• Kimberlee Weatherall, Politics, Compromise, Text and the Failures of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, 33 Sydney L. Rev. 229 (2011)
• Daniel Lifschitz, THE ACTA BOONDOGGLE: WHEN IP HARMONIZATION BITES OFF MORE THAN IT CAN CHEW, 34 Loy. L.A. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 197 (2011)
• Cynthia M. Ho, An Overview of 'TRIPS-Plus' Standards, Loyola University Chicago School of Law Research Paper No. 2011-033 (2011)
• Graeme B. Dinwoodie , A Neofederalist Vision of TRIPS: The Resilience of the International Intellectual Property Regime - Chapters 6-7, Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12/2012 (2012)
• Peter K. Yu , ENFORCEMENT, ENFORCEMENT, WHAT ENFORCEMENT?, 52 IDEA 239 (2011)
• William Peter Lane , TRAPPED IN CHINA'S SHADOW? INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION IN POST-WTO-ACCESSION RUSSIA, 36 B.C. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 183 (2012)
• Frederick M. Abbott , Intellectual Property and Public Health: Meeting the Challenge of Sustainability, FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 566 (2011)
• J. Janewa Oseitutu, VALUE DIVERGENCE IN GLOBAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, 87 Ind. L.J. 1639 (2012)
• Henning Grosse Ruse-Khan , The (Non) Use of Treaty Object and Purpose in Intellectual Property Disputes in the WTO, Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property & Competition Law Research Paper No. 11-15 (2011)
• Frederick M. Abbott , TRIPS and Human Rights: Preliminary Reflections, INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND HUMAN RIGHTS: FOUNDATIONS AND CONCEPTUAL ISSUES, p. 145, F. Abbott, C. Breining-Kaufmann & T. Cottier, eds., University of Michigan Press, 2006 (2006)
• Cynthia M. Ho , GLOBAL ACCESS TO MEDICINE: THE INFLUENCE OF COMPETING PATENT PERSPECTIVES, 35 Fordham Int'l L.J. 1 (2011)
• Kristen Osenga, GET THE BALANCE RIGHT!: SQUARING ACCESS WITH PATENT PROTECTION, 25 Pac. McGeorge Global Bus. & Dev. L.J. 309 (2012)
• Jennifer M. Champagne, ACCESS TO ESSENTIAL MEDICINES IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: THE ROLE OF INTERNATIONAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW & POLICY IN THE ACCESS CRISIS, 22 Alb. L.J. Sci. & Tech. 75 (2012)
• Marco Bronckers, Is the EU Obliged to Improve the Protection of Trade Secrets? An Inquiry into TRIPS, the European Convention on Human Rights and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 34, No. 10, pp. 673-688, 2012 (2012)
• Trudo Lemmens, Access to Information and the Right to Health: The Human Rights Case for Clinical Trials Transparency, 38 Am. J.L. & Med. 63 (2011)
• Oliver Budzinski, Intellectual Property Rights and the WTO: Innovation Dynamics, Commercial Copyrights and International Governance, Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers, Vol. 17, No. 71 (2012)
• Cynthia M. Ho , An Introduction to TRIPS, Loyola University Chicago School of Law Research Paper No. 2011-021 (2011)
• Susy Frankel , Attempts to Protect Indigenous Culture Through Free Trade Agreements, Victoria University of Wellington Legal Research Paper No. 34/2011 (2011)
• Kojo Yelpaala, QUO VADIS WTO? THE THREAT OF TRIPS AND THE BIODIVERSITY CONVENTION TO HUMAN HEALTH AND FOOD SECURITY, 30 B.U. Int'l L.J. 55 (2012)
• Justin Erickson, CALL FOR REFORM: ANALYZING TRIPS THROUGH EUROPEAN SEIZURE OF GENERIC MEDICATION, 21 Minn. J. Int'l L. 382 (2012)
• Laurie E. Abbott, INCENTIVE FOR INNOVATION OR INVITATION TO INHUMANITY?: A HUMAN RIGHTS ANALYSIS OF GENE PATENTING AND THE CASE OF MYRIAD GENETICS, 2012 Utah L. Rev. 497 (2012)
• Maxim V. Gubarev, MISAPPROPRIATION AND PATENTING OF TRADITIONAL ETHNOBOTANICAL KNOWLEDGE AND GENETIC RESOURCES, 8 J. Food L. & Pol'y 65 (2012)
• Bryan Christopher Mercurio , ‘Seizing’ Pharmaceuticals in Transit: Analysing the WTO Dispute that Wasn’t, (2012) 61(2) International and Comparative Law Quarterly 389-426 (2012)
• Reid Johnson, BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN THE BIODIVERSITY CONVENTION AND TRIPS: A NEW WAY TO APPROACH TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, 14 Gonz. J. Int'l L. 3 (2011)
• Emir Crowne , Fishing TRIPS: A Look at the History of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property, Creighton International and Comparative Law Journal, Vol. 2, No. 1, p. 77, Fall/Winter 2011 (2011)
• Jayashree Watal , From Punta Del Este to Doha and Beyond: Lessons from the TRIPS Negotiating Processe, (2011)
• Peter K. Yu, Trade Agreement Cats and Digital Technology Mouse, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY IN INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW: BALANCING COMPETING INTERESTS, Bryan Mercurio and Ni Kuei-Jung, eds., Routledge, 2013 (2012)
• Jerome H. Reichman , WHEN COPYRIGHT LAW AND SCIENCE COLLIDE: EMPOWERING DIGITALLY INTEGRATED RESEARCH METHODS ON A GLOBAL SCALE, 96 Minn. L. Rev. 1362 (2012)
• Orit Fischman Afori , FLEXIBLE REMEDIES AS A MEANS TO COUNTERACT FAILURES IN COPYRIGHT LAW, 29 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J. 1 (2011)
• Stephen Bright, THE CURRENT STATE OF BITTORRENT IN INTERNATIONAL LAW: WHY COPYRIGHT LAW IS INEFFECTIVE AND WHAT NEEDS TO CHANGE, 17 New Eng. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 265 (2011)
• Khaliunaa Garamgaibaatar, THE ANTI-COUNTERFEITING TRADE AGREEMENT: COPYRIGHTS, INTERMEDIARIES, AND DIGITAL PIRATES, 20 CommLaw Conspectus 199 (2011)
• Sean Williams, CLOSING IN ON THE LIGHT AT WIPO: MOVEMENT TOWARDS A COPYRIGHT TREATY FOR VISUALLY IMPAIRED PERSONS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MOVEMENTS, 33 U. Pa. J. Int'l L. 1035 (2012)
• Edward Lee, COPYRIGHT, DEATH, AND TAXES, 47 Wake Forest L. Rev. 1 (2012)
• Alberto J. Cerda Silva, COPYRIGHT CONVERGENCE IN THE ANDEAN COMMUNITY OF NATIONS, 20 Tex. Intell. Prop. L.J. 429 (2012)
• Daniel J. Gervais , THE DERIVATIVE RIGHT, OR WHY COPYRIGHT LAW PROTECTS FOXES BETTER THAN HEDGEHOGS, 15 Vand. J. Ent. & Tech. L. 785 (2013)
• Alexander Peukert , The Colonial Legacy of the International Copyright System, Forthcoming in: Mamadou Diawara & Ute Röschenthaler (eds), Staging the Immaterial. Rights, Style and Performance in Sub-Saharan Africa, Oxford: Sean Kingston (2012)
• Kitsuron Sangsuvan, SEPARATION OF POWERS IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS: BALANCING GLOBAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS OR MONOPOLY POWER IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY BY COMPETITION LAW, 26 N.Y. Int'l L. Rev. 1 (2013)
• Chung-Lun Shen , Intellectual Property Rights and International Free Trade — New Jurisprudence of International Exhaustion Doctrine Under Traditional Legal System, Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology, Vol. 7, Issue 3, pp.176-211, 2012 (2012)
• Yong-shik Lee, BEYOND THE DOHA ROUND: TOWARDS DEVELOPMENT FACILITATION IN THE WORLD TRADING SYSTEM, 40 Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 384 (2012)